After all, these are not American citizens, they are Mexican citizens (for the most part).
If we are going to protect the citizens of Mexico working illegally in the USA, why discriminate against the citizens of Mexico working in Mexico?
2006-11-15 13:13:34 · 14 answers · asked by Zoe 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
i think its called nafta lol
2006-11-15 13:25:26 · answer #1 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Interesting question. As a practical matter we lack the ability to protect those in other countries. Sometimes we lack the ability to protect those in our country. I guess the legal argument is that we are responsible for the welfare of everyone who is here. I think that is only partially true, but I'm not a lawyer.
2006-11-15 13:26:17 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In what way do you expect your government to protect them?
You don't really seem to protect the illegal workers in the US but some industries thrive on them.
In any case, with the growing hispanic LEGAL population, smart politicians in your country are going to look for ways to put that vote on their side.
2006-11-15 13:22:36 · answer #3 · answered by rostov 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because thats Mexicos job.
2006-11-15 13:15:21 · answer #4 · answered by Ahab 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We don't have sovereignty in Mexico.
I Cr 13;8a
11-15-6
2006-11-15 13:16:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason we do not protect the workers in Argentina, or Great Briatain or anywhere else in the world... the job sites are not within our borders.
2006-11-15 13:16:41 · answer #6 · answered by Bradly S 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
and enable us not ignore the different unlawful subject matters in different aspects of the country: Washington has a diverse blend of immigrants from maximum different metropolitan aspects. the biggest crew is from El Salvador, yet they are nowhere close to maximum persons. Koreans, Indians, Vietnamese, and Mexicans are the subsequent greatest communities. Washington is likewise attractive to Africans from many international locations, there are nicely over one hundred,000 contained in the areas. and that is only washington.
2016-11-24 21:45:04 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's really inverted logic....1) its not the job of the US government to be "protecting" anyone but citizens and residents of the US; 2) it violates the sovereignty of Mexico to be attempting to affect what is going on there. DUH! Obviously you are asking a rhetorical question here and I refuse to answer what you really are getting at because your question is a "loaded" one, presupposing a certain response and answer.
2006-11-15 13:16:23 · answer #8 · answered by William E 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I understand the point your trying to make, but remember the liberal dems what them here for the next amnesty, register them and get moe democratic votes. Thats what it's all about, they could care less about them
2006-11-15 13:18:13 · answer #9 · answered by 79vette 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dumb question.
How are they protecting the ones in the US? If they find out out them, they go back.
Besides, no one gives a **** about Mexicans.
2006-11-15 13:15:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are making a good point. Why stop there right. Let's be a little more dumb than we already are.
2006-11-15 13:55:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋