Should The US invade Iran?..?

Question

Iran no doubt will have a Nuclear weapon soon,and they will definetly use it against Israel.

Answer 1

I agree with you but I think we should just bomb their nuclear plants and spare the lives of our soldiers.

Answer 2

Having a nuclear bomb is only part of the problem. According to CNN the US has aprox 10000 nukes, Israel 50 - 100, North Korea 2 or 3, Iran with 2 or 5 nukes would not be much of a foe, much less now without any. Therefore, isnt the whole nuke issue just being overblown, just like the WOMD in Irak's case? All part of a master plan to control the middle east's oil reserves?

Answer 3

The US should not invade Iran, that would create more problems than it would solve. Don't worry about Iran using a nuclear weapon on Israel; if there's any chance Iran could be getting close to one, Israel would strike first, and strike hard (go Jews!!!).

Answer 4

The effect of one attack on Iran could end the troubles in Iraq and stop the terrorist movement world wide. Just taking out the one city could save millions of lives. Naturally the rest of the world Will complain but what is done is done. Since the UN is unable to do anything about Dafur or N. Korea or even Iran's nuclear program it is time someone ( US or Israel) take out the pin in the backside of the world.

Answer 5

this would be a wise policy. Iran is very dangerous. Irak was no more. Saddam should have been an asset not the man to kill.

Bin Laden should be searched in Pakistan no matter what the pakis would think of it, and they are helping the Talibans. if necessary ask India for assistance.

and something urgent should be done against Saoudi Arabia who is financing extremism around the world.

Answer 6

Oh yes totally Go start another War the Iraq one is going so swimmingly .

What the hell make it a Muslim country hat trick

Hell just go take on the whole Eastern Hemisphere with China and North Korea while your at it.

Ya better get a draft going first cause I would like to know where your going to get the troops...Have you enlisted yet? Sign your kids up while your at it .
If your wanting to take on everyone you should be ready to do your part shouldent you? Or do you plann on being an armchair tough guy . Start wars as long as you don't have to go and fight

What ever happened to National Defence I didn't think it ment laying waist to everyone who disagrees with you

Answer 7

Did you know that Haliburton, Dick Cheney's old pals, sold Iran the equipment they needed to enrich uranium? Do ya think they might have done this in order to give them an excuse to invade Iran surely knowing that they would do with it what they have done with it?

Answer 8

Of course not.
All war is abhorant. Especially now that the US is leaving depleted uranium everywhere and destroying the planet. Much of the middle east now has so much radiation that it is vitually unhabitable, and will remain so for ever.

Depleted uranium video
http://elequity.com/du/DU.swf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2NHfoC2pc&mode=related&search_

Depleted Uranium - Far Worse Than 9/11
For hundreds of years to come, the effects of the uranium will continue to wreak

... "American forces admit to using over 300 tons of DU weapons in 1991. ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?

context=viewArticle&code=20060503&articleId=2374

Answer 9

I say US bombs the **** out of every arabic/persian terrorist god damn country. Like the other dude said, the sooner the better and imagine IF, one day the arabs group up together and attack USA, u wouldnt like that would u?

SO DOWN WITH IRAN/IRAQ/ISRAEL ETC

Answer 10

Either us or Israel or both of us together! The sooner the better is right!