Here are some reasons you might not have found him:
He entered through a port you haven't yet searched.
He immigrated to Canada and then crossed the border into Minnesota.
His name was different at the time he immigrated than the name he used lated in life.
His name is misspelled on the record.
His name is misindexed in the index.
His family immigrated under a pseudonym to avoid financial, legal, or military problems.
The manifest on which he was listed was lost or destroyed.
There are lots more reasons.
Right now, through the end of November, Ancestry.com is offering free access to their immigration collection which contains indexed digital images of all easily obtainable US passenger manifests (not just Ellis Island). So, if you haven't already checked out this resource, do so now!
Another option is to look for naturalization papers. the naturalization record should tell you the name of the ship and the date of immigration. Since he was born in 1894 and moved to Idaho in 1910, he would have been naturalized in Idaho. Check the microfilms for Idaho naturalization records at the Family History Library (you can borrow these through a Family History Center near you). The Family History Library has the following naturalization records:
Naturalization records, Central District, Moscow, Idaho, 1892-1935 United States. District Court (Idaho)
Naturalization records, Eastern District, Pocatello, Idaho, 1893-1945 United States. District Court (Idaho)
Naturalization records, Northern District, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 1909-1929 United States. District Court (Idaho)
Naturalization records, Southern District, Boise, Idaho, 1891-1934 United States. District Court (Idaho)
One last point: a person did not have to be a citizen to have a social security card or serve in the military.
2006-11-15 07:35:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steven Jay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had that problem over ten years ago, in a Mormon Church.
They said many people would change their names when they came here, and there could be errors in the census records.
I just gave up cause I could only go back to my great grandparents.
They said the more names you know, and birthdays, the better chance you have of finding your ancestry.
2006-11-15 03:10:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by pixles 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
an entire and entire loss of useful management. enjoying the possibilities and playing with the way forward for the US extremely of actual looking, useful management has led to our cutting-edge mess. additionally, way too plenty deregulation and cuts to mandatory courses. The Bush administration's theory of smaller government is to permit each and every thing pass by utilising itself. If human beings have been straightforward, that would desire to artwork. human beings are not straightforward, they're grasping thieves if left unchecked and deregulated in the corporate sector.
2016-10-15 14:07:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's his last name? I wasn't even looking for them, but I was on ancestry.com and found a couple of my great uncles listed on WWI enlistment records. Have you tried those?
2006-11-15 03:01:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by braennvin2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I found that my "name" was not correct on the paperwork, all the data was.
The church of affiliation was the way I found my roots, they had much better records than the government even!
Best wishes!
2006-11-15 02:53:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Denise W 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
there in AREA 51
2006-11-15 02:58:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they don't exist
2006-11-15 02:53:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by monte 1
·
0⤊
0⤋