Should they back off and let themselves get runned over?
Should they keep guns loaded, and prepare for war to insure a greater degree of insurance?
2006-11-15 00:10:50 · 10 answers · asked by Diadem 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Of coarse, they should always keep their guns at the ready, and I think they should be more aggressive towards the fools that don't think they have the right to exist, i.e. Iran. Further more I think that the US should help them more than we already do, I am sick of us telling Israel to turn the other cheek, when we wouldn't if the roles were reversed.
2006-11-15 01:38:41 · answer #1 · answered by Jon 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course. If someone looks weak they get picked on. If they look like they'll anyones butt that attacks them most people won't. So, I'm going with (B). That's easy. I'm only thirteen. If only more people thought this way. Anyway, great question. to bad more people didn't answer it.
2006-11-15 09:10:29 · answer #2 · answered by Dallas L 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They should be the ones to attack. That is the only way they can achieve some peace. They are too damn small to wait for the enemy to attack them first.
I feel for that country, but their administration is so wimpy and incompetent...
2006-11-15 09:45:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
B! Hopefully they can hit Iran before Iran hits them.
2006-11-15 09:29:45 · answer #4 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They do. They have to. Crazy people all around them want to murder them all.
2006-11-15 09:34:27 · answer #5 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think this is what they should continue doing
2006-11-15 08:18:13 · answer #6 · answered by Rose 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They should to exist.
2006-11-15 09:55:43 · answer #7 · answered by toty 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
STAND UP AND FIGHT .
IT WILL NEVER CHANGE THERE
2006-11-15 08:48:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do.
2006-11-15 09:32:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
POOT.
2006-11-15 08:48:57 · answer #10 · answered by scottstapp_1 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋