English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am baffle with the fact that the scientist and the fictionist who are the hinge on which the world of the development revovles get us confused with there collections of information and details regarding the existence of God (Allah).

2006-11-15 00:06:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

Science has only recently discovered what has been in the Quran 1400 years ago. It's silly that they don't believe in Allah. There are so many signs, but people are just ignorant.

May Allah guide them,
Wasalam

2006-11-15 00:11:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Actually, the smartest and most educated scientists do, in fact, believe in God. They all say how could someone not believe in God.
I know this for a fact. Wish I had the links to give you.
But they don't come out in the open to avoid losing their status of being great scientists; those who are less knowledgable than they are, but have more power, will run them out of "a job" and call them crazy, and unfortunaltey, the media will feast on this and ruin these men and women. THey have families to feed.

Pretty much, to completely see and study and understand science, one cannot disbelieve in God. It's impossible and controversial.

2006-11-15 00:15:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

A lot of people don't believe in anything that they physically see. Even if God were to knock on their doors, they wouldn't believe. Many scientists are getting around to looking at intelligent design, which is a step in the right direction, but then the question remains as to whom the designer is. At this point the Holy Books need to be studied. For me it is Jesus.

2006-11-15 00:18:10 · answer #3 · answered by RB 7 · 0 0

islam is only 1400 years old. so the kid (islam) is not yet grown up, so stop making coments on what you dont know. the earth is 5 billion years old. islam is the religon of ignorants. the prophet itself was an igorant buffoon. those who know the history of the qur'aan and prophet know things well.

scientists are not worried about allah. its islam, qur'aan and allah who are worried that their words have been proved wrong all through the 1400 years. islam doesnot have the ability to come forward for a debate with proof. islam is based on terrorism. thats why they killed so many innocents through the ages, and still goes on doing it.

problem with muslims and islam is that they are uneducated, uncivilized. whereever they go, their only aim is to create tension in civilized society.

now you brought another person into this controversy. it show that muslims are real idiots. that new person is Fictionist. who is a fictionist? what is the basis of fictionist? i think by reading qur'aan these muslims have become real stupid. they dont even know the meaning of the word fiction. fiction is not something based on truth. its just imagination, unreal. but that word fits well with islam. islam lives in a fictional world. thier allah himself is a fiction. for 1400 years they could not bring the proof of allah. still there is time. please do come down with allah the next time you come to this section with another question. i am here to answer your question.

2006-11-15 03:56:09 · answer #4 · answered by Raja Krsnan 3 · 0 0

lots of persons in the international theory the sunlight orbited the earth. lots of persons in the international theory you will desire to therapy illnesses by utilising blood-letting. lots of persons in the international theory super sea monsters attacked ships. lots of persons in the international theory it became impossible which you will take the midsection of a lifeless individual and transplant it into the physique of a residing individual. only because of the fact the time-honored public of persons think of something, that doesn't recommend that's actual. this is why we progressed the medical approach. that's a manner of forming conclusions in keeping with info. we've been this type of achievement with technological information and how it describes the actual international that we now practice the comparable technique to different aspects (economics, finance, social technological information, politics, etc). the factor i'm making is that the medical approach won't be perfect, in spite of the undeniable fact that that's at the instant the perfect way we human beings have progressed for comprehend-how our universe. for this reason, if we practice the medical approach to the question of God, then the load of info falls on believers. it relatively is because of the fact in technological information you do no longer postulate the life of issues which you do no longer require to describe what you word. we don't carry out technological information by utilising springing up an theory with each and every a possibility difficulty we can think of off, and then get rid of them one by utilising one by utilising performing lots of experiments for each possiblity we considered. extremely, we build the thought from the floor up, no longer build down the thought. so which you have 2 thoughts. anticipate that God exists and then attempt to disprove your conjecture. that's no longer medical. what's medical is to anticipate there is not any God till you require that hypothesis to describe what you word. this is why the load of info is on 'proving God' extremely than 'disproving God'.

2016-10-15 13:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

Everything in the world, from our human body to the animals and plants testifies to a wonderful designer. Can a house build itself even when you come upon it on an island? No! Certainly not. The wonderful designs of our body's DNA, the atmosphere, etc give praise to the Almighty God who has created us wonderfully. I dont need scientific proof from anyone cos i can see all the proof of a creator everywhere and in everything.

2006-11-15 00:18:50 · answer #6 · answered by girlfunny 3 · 0 0

You lump Scientist and Fictionist in the same group, are the advances of modern science fiction to you?

2006-11-15 00:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by jedi1josh 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers