English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Caring only about her own selfish desire to stay in this country, Elvira Arellano has used her son as a human shield to tug at the heartstrings of Americans and our elected officials. Hoping to escape punishment for the crimes she has committed, this woman shows that not even the welfare or the emotional stability of her son will stop her.

While most children are happily in school, 7-year-old Saul Arellano must do his mothers bidding:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MEXICO_MIGRANT_SON?SITE=TXELP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
“Gross pandering” is putting it mildly. This smacks of child neglect and child exploitation. To allow this child to travel without his mother and then to shove him in front of cameras to make a case for his mother’s crimes is, now at the top of the list of crimes this woman has committed.When will our government put an end to the exploitation of this child?

2006-11-14 08:07:18 · 17 answers · asked by Zoe 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

17 answers

It becomes this nations business when this person is exploiting her 7 year old son for her own agenda.This is a frail looking child any way ,he always looks like he needs a good meal and to be able to play like other little 7 year old boys play..I feel concern for the child but none for his mother.She is using him as a tool for her own selfish gain,if you think its none of our business then tell her to bring her butt out and surrender to the ICE,do things the right way instead of acting so selfish.I too think that CPS should step in and rescue that child until this charade is over.Hes a 7 year old being sent to Mexico to speak to both party's of the Mexican government.Poor little boy,he must be scared to death.

2006-11-14 08:28:37 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 6 1

Zoe;
I agree with you whoeheartedly. She is playing this very smart, and you've got to give her that. Why not rape the stupid US legal system a little more?

A law need to be passed REPEALING "Anchor babies" right to citizenship. They have to be sent back to their country of origin, along with their illegal parents.

There is a procedure for seeking LEGAL citizenship, albeit a lousy one in illegals eyes, but it HAS to be upheld so everyone realizes their best chance to stay here is to fall in line...,

Make sense? It would also eliminate all challenges to the system that stamp every illegals case as 'special', or 'extenuating'.

The US should OUTLAW this illegal invasion by legal challenge.

Try sneaking into Mexico and see what happens to you! Talk about HYPOCRITES! Mexico is HYPOCRITICAL when it comes to their treatment of illegals.

Now that the Democrats are in power, lets see how bad THEY mishandle this problem. They can't 'F' things up like the Republicans did, but truth be told, they really are no better.

Since this mess is our own fault, Only once a terrorist who was smuggled into this country or sneaked in via Venuezuela legal documents, THEN you will see there will be hell to pay.

No one will take responsibility but the borders WILL be sealed.

We just have to wait to see when the next round of thousands sacrificed, (probably from Washington DC, or New York City) will be killed however, successfully killing thousands more and the finger pointing will start,

BUT SADLY..., ONLY THEN WILL THE BORDERS BE SEALED!

2006-11-14 09:29:12 · answer #2 · answered by Number1son 3 · 3 0

For starters, i'm indignant, like the others who replied till now me, whilst there's a assessment between a 2 bit offender, and a corageous citizen. despite the fact that, after analyzing, and re-analyzing your question, i think of I see the place you're going with that assessment. you're making an analogy between a legitamate heroine, and an illegitemate figurehead. If i'm superb im my reasoning, then you certainly are suitable. Ours is extra valuable than theirs. the reality that their "heroine" did not even instruct at that march, says lots. She isn't making a stand, extremely, she's merely making a stink, and cowering in a church. Rosa Parks bravely made a stand, confronted the government, and rose above adversity to convey on substitute. Sir, I apologise to you for initially being indignant. That became right into a surprising assessment. It says lots. I additionally admire the way you published that information article following your question. enable us to work out if she exhibits up on Sept. 12, or extremely unearths yet another place to cower in, extremely of being brave (my money's having a gamble that she'll be hiding some the place).

2016-10-17 06:56:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pretty much it goes like this

A. Deport her to Mexico, and let her son go with her.

B. Deport her to Mexico, and find foster care for her son.

C. Allow her to stay in America, but serve out the prison sentence for her crimes, and find foster care for her son.

She should get no choice D, and give her a time limit to think about it. If she does not comply, raid the church and have her deported.

Note : Mexican law states, a child born to a Mexican national is a citizen of Mexico.

2006-11-14 09:02:43 · answer #4 · answered by clone_marshal_bacara 2 · 4 1

The littlest violin player... I think the woman is a coward just like all the rest of the illegal aliens hiding behind their children!

We're just a piece of FREE meat to illegal aliens. Why should we feel sympathetic about an illegal alien with an anchor baby? If you break the law, you should be prepared to live with the consequences...

The 14th Amendment was not a grant of citizenship! It did not confer citizenship! It merely defined citizenship and the manner by which it could be obtained.

2006-11-14 08:29:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

They are trying to set a precedence. This way the anchor babies will be worthwhile to the parents. A clear and vile case of political child abuse. Ship her back to mexico and let the child have the opportunity to be adopted by a loving family who will not use him but protect him from being used.

2006-11-14 08:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by Patriot 1 · 6 1

She should be prosecuted for exploiting her child. She knows and understands full well what she is doing, and she is using her child to mess with the system and it isn't right The government needs to step up and end it.

2006-11-14 09:45:27 · answer #7 · answered by Kikyo 5 · 3 1

Pro-illegals will likely call her a hero, but I think she should be turned into child protective services. You don't send a little kid to another country alone, you don't use a little kid as leverage, and you don't expect him to take time out from the business of being a kid to do YOUR business. Whatever race, religion, or legal status she is- she's a bad mom. It's very simple.

2006-11-14 08:19:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

It just shows more and more that illegals will stop at nothing to stay here. She has broken the law how many times ? Has used stolen and fake ids. And then gos boo hoo crying to the church. How much lower can she get ?

2006-11-14 08:40:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Its a shame that she is using her son that way. But then, she already used him as an anchor, so it isn't surprising. I wish they would just deport her and end all of this nonsense. First she sent him to talk to Bush at the White House and now he's going to Mexico. Mexico can't do anything to change our immigration laws so what is the point?

2006-11-14 08:13:12 · answer #10 · answered by Niecy 6 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers