There is not enough chocolate on this earth to cover the bug up enough so that I could eat it.
2006-11-14 06:48:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Colleen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Bugs have just as much nutritional value as any other sort of "meat". If I am starving, it wouldn't even have to be covered in chocolate. Criminy! It's worth it to stay alive! I have heard that grasshoppers in Chinese dishes are actually really good.
2006-11-14 14:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by stillstanding 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neiman Marcus use to sell chocolate covered ants, bees, bugs of all kinds and when you are a kid you will eat anything dipped in choclate
2006-11-14 14:55:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Janna 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have. Chocolate covered ants are not bad. A little more tang than covered raisins. Chocolate covered grasshoppers are too crunchy to be pleasant to eat.
2006-11-14 14:50:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by margcolins 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not anymore. I'm a vegetarian. But beforehand, I'd eaten fried grasshoppers many times. No reason not to take one with a little chocolate.
2006-11-14 14:45:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by texascrazyhorse 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope
2006-11-14 16:52:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by juicie813 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have and would again. My Dad brought home chocolate covered ants, grasshoppers, and potato chips (which were amazing). It was chocolate and it was good!
2006-11-14 14:46:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by ÐIESEŁ ÐUB 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i have before in 6th grade. we all ate chocolate covered crickets. our teacher was weird
2006-11-14 17:28:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's just say this...If there was nothing else to eat and I was starving...Then yes!!
2006-11-14 14:51:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Misty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, sure, if I had to. My baby bro eats them for fun. Gross, eh?
TW x
2006-11-14 14:47:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋