Our Science? No.
The science that will develop after Armageddon, when we have 100% use of our brains, perhaps. We may even develop a way to travel to the other planets without ships.
2006-11-14 01:45:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"No. In fact, everything we know about science is trending the opposite way. The human consciousness is strictly tied to the hard-wiring of the human brain - the two are inextricable. That's why you can put a substance in your body like alcohol and have it change the way you "feel." If the intellect - spirit - were separate from our brain chemistry, that would not work. The way our brains work as organic bodies determines are thoughts, feelings, and consciousness. So the whole paranormal notion of a "spirit" is not congruent with science."
That's total nonsense. The only science that is pointing that direction is biased athesistic science that doesn't believe in an afterlife. The reality is they have no way to test what happens after death except for in the physical, electrical and checmical processes of the body. The fact is while we are alive the spirit is an integral part of the physical body in that whatever happens to the physical affects the spiritual and vice versa. We can see the physical portion of this since we can test it and it would be easy to dismiss anything where the spiritual affects the physical as being caused by purely physical. Once the body dies it is not a hard concept to grasp that the spiritual portion of our existence is detached leaving only the lifeless physical self. So the whole paranormal notion of the "spirit" is not congruent with science only when the scientist has a preconceived notion that the spirit didn't exist in the first place and therefore backs that belief up based on the fact that he has no way or no idea of how to test it. They have the belief that "if I can't test it then it must not be real."
The fact is that of all the knowledge of the universe we as humans at best know 1% of it, meaning that the empircal evidence for the existence of God, Jesus, The Holy Ghost, Angels, spirits, the afterlife, etc. could be contained in the other 99%. That is assuming that in the 1% of knowledge we have there is NO empirical evidence, but I think many would argue that is not the case, that the evidence is right there, only some refuse to see what is front of them.
If you do not believe in God you will not believe in the things of God. To believe is to see, not the other way around.
2006-11-14 02:35:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bruce Leroy - The Last Dragon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. In fact, everything we know about science is trending the opposite way. The human consciousness is strictly tied to the hard-wiring of the human brain - the two are inextricable. That's why you can put a substance in your body like alcohol and have it change the way you "feel." If the intellect - spirit - were separate from our brain chemistry, that would not work. The way our brains work as organic bodies determines are thoughts, feelings, and consciousness. So the whole paranormal notion of a "spirit" is not congruent with science.
2006-11-14 01:37:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by texascrazyhorse 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do i think in them? Yep. am i able to coach it in any way? Nope. Does that difficulty me? as quickly as in a blue moon, yet no longer often. component of it extremely is, i think of, your definition. i think of that my spirit is that component of me different than the actual depend and bio-chemical-electric powered methods occurring. For all i be attentive to, my concepts, sense of morality, ethical compass- call it what you will- is a function of genetics, or concepts chemistry, or early teachings, or some thing even though it FEELS to me to be break away that. i think of there's a undeniable quantity fo self-fable right here- hoping that there is a facet of me it extremely is 'bigger' in a roundabout way than the 'meat'. At this factor in my existence, i'm no longer even extremely confident my spirit or soul will stay to tell the tale after dying, and that i hit upon I care approximately that much less and much less besides (and extra and extra on the topic of the common of my existence right here and now and how i'm reaping rewards others.) The term 'believe' has 2 considerable meanings, spiritually. One is to have entire believe interior the element- to be certain of it no depend what. To be keen to wager each little thing we've and are on the element. the different is the extra easy way we use it as we talk- to think of that some thing ought to be the case with out being too keen to wager lots on it. My theory interior the soul or spirit falls on a pair of 6 out of 10, with 10 being 'wager the farm solid'.
2016-12-14 06:57:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by pfarr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science doesn't have to "prove" the exsistence of spirit. Though you and I are in human form presently, we are the only living being--animal or plant---, with an inner soul that will live on after we die. To be a "recoginized spirit", the being must have a soul.
2006-11-14 01:40:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, you are right, since i don't believe in God, I should believe in Light. Maybe in wind because i can't see that either. I better be careful though, before i know it by believing in the forces of "spirits" by their definition i will be labeled as a Pagan Witch and be burnt by the Christians!
2006-11-14 01:37:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jon C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is spiritualism
this is what i believe
science works with those of my faith who see spirit
sadly not many people understand or want to understand that
but if you are curious to how science works with spirit i can offer you a few links to check out xxx
http://www.snu.org.uk/spirit.htm
http://www.sspr.co.uk/
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/
2006-11-14 01:46:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Peace 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly. It's possible though that our science has not evolved to the point where it could detect it.
2006-11-14 01:37:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by mrssamikeyp 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, God will show Himself one of these days, the question is are you ready for that day
2006-11-14 01:39:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
you can never really disprove the spirit, so there's always that off chance.
2006-11-14 01:38:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋