English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

If he was a billionaire, even I would

2006-11-14 00:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by gare 5 · 0 0

How could he be good to you if he don't work.If you was to pay all the bills and I get to sit at home and wait till you come home from a hard day at work i would be dam good to you too. COME ON BABY YOU MIGHT THINK YOUR IN LOVE ,BUT LET'S THINK ABOUT THIS .Kick his lazy a_ _ to the curb you could do better and it seems you have a good heart .Unless this man has a reason to not be able to work .If he is disabled or some sort and receives a check then go for it .Hope this helps you out a lot .

2006-11-14 09:03:12 · answer #2 · answered by AMBRASIA C 2 · 0 0

I would have np/w that, as long as mentally and physically there, such as cooking cleaning taking the kids to and from school and other activities, believe it or not there are a lot of stay at home dads in this millennium, because a lot more woman are independent and self sufficient, or just simply want to work to provide for the family, why should a woman stay home and let all her degrees get dusty just to be the a typical house wife/(stay @ home mom).......

2006-11-14 09:00:55 · answer #3 · answered by goldenkitty187inc 1 · 0 0

No, sounds like you need a sugar mamma! A marriage is equal you should both contribute. Now, if you cleaned the house did laundry and had a hot meal for me when I got home for work then when we had children you take care of them and do all the house work then yes. But you don't plan to work so I'm guessing you wouldn't like the house work or the child raising. But thats just my opinion plenty of women Mary lazy guys who don't work and treat them badly so I guess you would be good for them b/c at least you would be good to them.

2006-11-14 09:00:07 · answer #4 · answered by Lovely Lady 27 5 · 0 0

It depends on whether he has another source of income. I wouldn't marry someone who couldn't at least take care of himself. On the other hand, it would be nice if he had lots of time to spend with me, plan fun things to do, take care of the house & kids, etc. It also depends on what he is doing with his life instead of working. If he makes good use of his time and has money in the bank and he is happy, then there is nothing wrong with that.

2006-11-14 08:58:14 · answer #5 · answered by HelpMeRhonda 2 · 0 0

I think he's good to me cause he doesn't plan to work his entire life! Haha.. but seriously, I guess... I can but ONLY if I was successful enough AND HE WILL DO the household chores. Its just a little role reversal. I guess its feminist, but who says that I can't be the sole breadwinner and he can't be the houseband? Besides its the 21st century, I can deal with that.

2006-11-14 09:00:21 · answer #6 · answered by stormsandblues 3 · 0 0

There are too many potential factors to properly answer this but I'll try...

yes...if he was self-sufficient without working...ie. had money put away.

yes...if I made enough money to support us both comfortably...with no financial worries...and HE was willing to take care of the household chores.

yes...if he's spending his time doing non-profit humanitarian work...improving the lives of people in need...and was willing to split the household work 50/50.

yes...if he was UNABLE to work for a medical reason.

No...even if he was the sweetest guy in the world but expected me to support him AND take care of all household chores while he drank beer and watched soap operas all day.

2006-11-14 08:59:49 · answer #7 · answered by Shakira 3 · 0 0

No, idle hands are work of the devil. And besides how could he be a man if he does not work and handle his financial responsibility? This is not a man, it is a boy who refuses to grow up and accept responsibility. God bless*

2006-11-14 08:57:23 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

No way. I can't stand people who have no ambition. Of course, I wouldn't marry the ambitious guy, either. I'm not the marrying kind.

2006-11-14 12:41:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A man need to work, to take care of his wife, and family. If you don't want to work then good luck finding a wife.

2006-11-14 09:00:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no i wouldnt.
the currency in relationships is not money, its power. the richest guy gets the most gorgeous girl. and vice versa.

u guys always try to get as gorgeous as possible, and we always try to get as rich as possible. thats the bare basics. everything else is a compromise or an exchange.

2006-11-14 08:58:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers