2006-11-13 21:46:54 · 11 answers · asked by RELIGION 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Mother of 3, and straight.
2006-11-13 21:49:43 · update #1
AIDS is no longer a gay disease. Trust westerners to be so incredibly insular in their understanding. More heterosexual people have AIDS on a global scale. It affects everyone and not just 'sexually immoral' people.
2006-11-13 23:34:37 · answer #1 · answered by dawnrazor99 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. And we nutcases don't condemn gay people today. You give us too much credit. We don't have the authority to condemn. Only to tell people that what they do leads to condemnation. Sex outside of marriage is considered a sin, and you can't call yourself a christian and continue to live in sin. We christians still sin, yes, but we wallow in it.
2006-11-14 05:53:02 · answer #2 · answered by ScottyJae 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm assuming your meaning as they condemn homosexual people and linking in with AIDS????
Fair point but did you know more straight people contract HIV and AIDS than gay people? So does that mean they should condemn straight people today?
2006-11-14 05:55:25 · answer #3 · answered by Claire O 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, you are demonstrating the most common misunderstanding towards people like me who oppose homosexuality.
When we criticize homosexuality, we are not endorsing all heterosexuality. We are against all sexual immorality, of which homosexuality is a subset.
We also oppose sexual promiscuity, another subset of sexual immorality, which spreads various STDs (i.e. Syphillis)
Why don't people like you recognize that monogamous married people don't catch AIDS or other STDs through their behavior? Doesn't that fact validate our claims?
-Aztec276
2006-11-14 05:56:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Are you serious?homosexuals are not condemned because of the HIV-AIDS problem alone,but mainly because of it is a gross sin and such people will be cut off from the earth.as for your question,all those having sex outside the bonds of marriage are sinning and usually pay for their actions in many ways.
2006-11-14 05:53:37 · answer #5 · answered by sherie 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
And those that don't think science is good should not be allowed any antibiotics today.
2006-11-14 06:06:14 · answer #6 · answered by Barabas 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those practicing sex before marriage, yes.
2006-11-14 05:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by Celestian Vega 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
At least they weren't getting it out of someone's A**!
2006-11-14 05:50:51 · answer #8 · answered by tumbleweed1954 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
If everyone only had sex with their spouse - there would be no diseases
2006-11-14 05:49:38 · answer #9 · answered by YO Y 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
everyone should be happy
2006-11-14 05:56:35 · answer #10 · answered by Labatt113 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋