This book was written hundreds of years before the time of Christ. A fact that is not disputed. I am truly interested in hearing your opinions and or beliefs about this passage.
2006-11-13 17:55:39 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Since you are trying to pass this whole chapter off as a Biblical prophesy of Jesus Christ as the Messiah, I think you should take a closer look at 53:10 (KJV)
53:10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.
Jesus had no "seed" according to your myths. He was childless. His days were not "prolonged" enough to spawn children according to your scriptures.
Yet one more proof that Jesus Christ was a false Messiah...
-SD-
2006-11-13 18:21:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wrong, chump. The bile - oops, bible - wasn't written down until 600 years after the alleged events it purports to report.
And what do I think about the lie - oops, line - from the buybull - oops, bible - that you mentioned? I think it's worthless tripe. You obviously feel the same since you didn't bother to post it yourself. Or did you erroneously assume people would bother looking up such twaddle?
.
2006-11-13 18:05:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think Isaiah 53:10 "Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him..." goes to show god is sadistic. Oh, wait, was I supposed to cry and think "Poor widdle Jesus"? Overall, the book didn't impress me.
2006-11-13 18:02:52 · answer #3 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only problem with your THEORY is that the latter books (new testament) were written to conform with the predictions in the old testament.
2006-11-13 18:04:43 · answer #4 · answered by Mac Momma 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We couldn't care less of what the book says.
All religion books including the bible have been writen by common men like you and me.
2006-11-13 18:04:08 · answer #5 · answered by mike 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't mention Christ by name tho, I just read it from my KJV.
2006-11-13 18:02:20 · answer #6 · answered by sweetgurl13069 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't say anything? I don't see the relevance or the point here.
2006-11-13 18:08:38 · answer #7 · answered by Alucard 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋