Congratulations, you've been voted #1 "dummass" in my book!
2006-11-13 14:10:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Katz 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
this is an occasion of what form of guy or woman could positioned as much as the favourite public scrutiny of their lives it is attendant with political ambition. a guy or woman with a judgment of right and incorrect will comprehend that no person is so clean that the media won't be able to drag them in the path of the airborne dirt and dust, even no depend if that's only with recommendations that they don't have become effectual in the indoors maximum sector quite. maximum media types only don't have faith that a guy or woman can grow to be a wealthy capitalist with out being corrupt and cheating people, and the favourite public has all started to have faith it. Wal-Mart is evil, McDonald's is evil, bill Gates is evil. all people with a feeling of shame will comprehend what's coming, and circumvent it. so as that leaves politics for the Eliot Spitzers, who haven't any shame, and leaves the media loose to hound those they decide to do away with, and forget approximately their buddies who help their own time table. this is not a distinction in the people of the events, the kind is regularly in the media's portrayals. Spitzer would desire to be an exception, even though that's only too quickly to tell approximately that.
2016-10-22 01:17:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by gaidos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
unfortunately everyone has a 3rd party nowadays. the problem with them is that they concentrate on one issue. democrats and republicans may differ in views but they encompass ALL issues.
all in all, the only thing a 3rd party does is further separate and allow the wrong people to get into office that much easier. its the reason dems lose elections. republicans keep their greedy lil hands in one jar at a time. dems are too split on too many issues. we dont have that solidarity because everyone thinks they're small issue is greater than the whole.
if you wanna make a difference start a lobbying group. pay them off. they all have a price. don't think for a minute just because some 3rd party gets into power that they can't get bought like dems and reps. there's trillions of dollars flowing around on the hill and they all get a piece of it. it's about individuals. and individually we can all be bought for the right price. i've never met someone who couldn't be bought yet. just gotta find the right price. thats what lobbyists do. think cigarette companies!
2006-11-13 14:21:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anthony Taurus 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree my friend. There are 70% of Americans who live in poverty levels. Poverty as in 17-20,000 a year. And both parties griping about welfare. It sickens me. Maybe if these people in office had to live on min wage or a couple of bucks more, maybe they would make some changes. Money being spent on a crap war instead of education. Democrats are the new republican. We need someone who is catering to the average American.
2006-11-13 14:24:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
From a retired military man - here's one of my favorite quotes ever:
Democracy is the worst form of government, except for every other form of government that's ever been tried.
Never ask the US Military to go against the elected government.
2006-11-13 14:13:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark Porter 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why do you need to start a third party? Pick from the many already established and join one.
http://www.thirdpartypolitics.org/thirdparty.html
And what does the military have to do with it?
2006-11-13 14:11:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just want a party or election campaign that speaks on issues instead of what the other guy did wrong. When all you get is mudslinging, it's not wonder people don't vote--they don't know what they're voting for.
2006-11-14 08:21:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by desiderio 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does the military have to do with either party? Don't use the military as a pawn in the advancement of what ever cause or party you are supporting.
2006-11-13 14:10:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
I agree, we could start by letting only US citizens and Taxpayers
vote. People on social assistance or subsidized housing, would
also be ineligible to vote.
2006-11-13 14:14:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
2 groups?
There is no republican or democrat party, they are the same.
Its a divide and conquer tactic, they're fascist banking communist.
2006-11-13 14:12:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋