English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Contrary to popular belief there have been hundreds of biological weapons found in Iraq, do think this is the liberal media not wanting to report this so they can continue to attack Bush for his reasons to go into Iraq or do you just think it is not worthy of news coverage?

2006-11-13 14:05:42 · 15 answers · asked by Maverick 2 in Politics & Government Military

15 answers

i have been saying the same thing i saw the news conference about them finding over 500 WMDs in Iraq and all i ever hear from people is that there was no WMDs as you can see on here there are people that don't want to omit they are wrong they just hate Bush so they will never say he is right but he is right

2006-11-13 17:32:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The chemical weapons the Reagan administration offered him in the time of the Iran-Iraq conflict. next? Edit- hey That guy? this is slightly quote from one in all your individual suitable wing internet spin rags: "The weapons are concept to be synthetic till now 1991 so that they does not be evidence of an ongoing WMD software in the Nineteen Eighteen Nineties." And asserting WMDs weren't the only rationalization for going into Iraq? nicely ya coulda fooled me son considering's all the Bush admin noted collectively as staging 15 divisions in Kuwait in 2003. Teh so spoke of as determination became into all theater staged by making use of a GOP congress wearing flag pins and gorging themselves on concern and freedom fries. you're merely yet another irrelavant apologist. Sucks do not it?

2016-10-17 06:08:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree with you that the news media has attacked Bush unfairly and that there have been WMDs found in Iraq, but in small quantities than expect. It is unfair to Bush, but Iraq is so divided internally, enough for them to kill their own people anyway, that things aren't the best over there. So to be fair I'll consent that but then others must consent the presense of WMDs and the genocide of Iraqi Kurds.
And cite your source before your attacked, so as to protect yourself from slander a bit.

2006-11-13 14:17:22 · answer #3 · answered by just a girl 3 · 3 0

It's Congressional record that 500 WMD were found. I can't help that disbelievers trust the news or don't watch C-Span. Many reporters go right out and say they are liberal Democrats. Of course they are going to bash the conservatives every chance they get.

2006-11-13 19:19:44 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0 0

Here is what the so-called "liberal" media has failed to report.

There are WMD's of a different sort being used in Iraq as we read this comment.

It is the use of depleted uranium in the tips of American bombs and artillery that was used in both the 1991 campaign and the 2003 invasion into Iraq.

IF you deny it, or scoff at the idea of looking into it, then you might as well spit in the face of our service men and women abroad. Spitting in their face would be a blessing compared to what they have been afflcited with. Thousands have returned with Gulf War Syndrome which has been linked to radical increases in cancer and birth defects here at home.

But in the sands of Iraq, it's even worse. There is evidence that the lingering effects of depleted uranium has contaminated soil and water tables. And whistleblowers have had their jobs threatened. Doctors are silenced to treat the triple digit spikes of Iraqi infant leukemia as ordinary and usual.

It takes 4.5 billion years to lose its radioactivity.

Which is worse, the immediate death one faces when a bomb is dropped on your neighborhood? Or the slow death you and your offspring will suffer for generations to come?

Liberal media? That's laughable. They all report on nothing of substance. CNN is only a stone's throw away from FOX. And yet so many people in this country and in this forum continue to leave their noses snug in the rectum of George Bush, it's sickening to think how they manage sleep and snore their lives away while people continue to die.

and watch... they'll give this a thumbs down. They sleep so soundly as the casualties of war fail to penetrate cold hearts that are unconditionally loyal to a failed administration.

Sleep well... in sin.

2006-11-13 14:37:09 · answer #5 · answered by Rob in NY 2 · 0 2

Why do you make this stuff up? Why cant you deal with reality?

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
- George Bush, lieing to the nation about Iraq

2006-11-13 14:59:07 · answer #6 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1 1

C'mon, C'mon C'mon...Where we these weapons found and how come you are the only one to know about it...Fox News would be over reporting it if hey had found them...The President has said himself that WMD's have not been found ...Is he Lying about finding them now?,,,,...It is funny how everything that went wrong in Iraq has been the Liberal media fault..I guess everything that went right has been their fault to? Finding Saddam..The liberal media did that... Well ...If everything that goes wrong in Iraq is their fault things that went right must also be their fault......
Let's just tell the truth about Iraq...It has been a bloody nightmare and a huge misjudgement on how things were going to go by this administration....

2006-11-13 14:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by LENNON3804 3 · 0 3

I'm sorry but i am unaware of any weapons that were in question being found.i am 100% sure if the President had any way to validate this war he would be on T.V.every 5 minutes shooting off his mouth about it.

2006-11-13 14:41:26 · answer #8 · answered by crazywildman1 3 · 1 0

You are living in a world of fantasy

2006-11-13 17:57:43 · answer #9 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 0

Cite your source.

2006-11-13 14:07:34 · answer #10 · answered by Dane 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers