English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Whose system (yahoo,google,hotmail,etc) is best able to handle large jpeg files? Not sure of the file size other than they are used by models and shot by professional photographers.

2006-11-13 12:13:33 · 5 answers · asked by iiifrdst 1 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

5 answers

yahoo! will do it. I use it all the time and love it. Just don't send too many at the same time. They give you 2gb of space and it's very easy to use it just like your new MS Outlook. I think that's what they were aiming at. I'm talking about their new Beta email service. It is very nice unlike some others. I like it much more than Gmail even!

2006-11-14 00:11:43 · answer #1 · answered by igorb81 1 · 0 0

I am a photographer, and I use Gmail. It is by far the best email for a photographer because it holds so much space, and is able to send huge image files at once.

My gmail currently is only filled up 3% with 80MB and i've been sending pictures back and forth to people for ages.
Another good thing about gmail is that once you send a photo once, it will be saved on the google server, and you can easily send it again.

2006-11-14 07:36:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd actually recommend a web hosting site like photobucket.com - most emails can't handle large pro photos. Probably gmail out of all of those is the most likely to be able to support larger files though.

2006-11-13 18:31:07 · answer #3 · answered by myaddictiontofire 5 · 0 0

I far as I know.., Gmail makes it much faster and gives more facilities in previewing and downloading... Now Yahoo is also quite equal competing with Gmail... I'm not sure abt the hotmail's server.. :-)
(I have no account other than yahoo..)

2006-11-13 15:45:39 · answer #4 · answered by Artin 3 · 0 0

maximum photograph modifying classes have an option for changing the size (or re-sizing) of a document. i do no longer think of winzip can do plenty to shrink the document length, as jpegs at the instant are not inefficient the way a observe rfile or Excel spreadsheet would be. once you do substitute your document length, be constructive to hold an identical relative dimensions, so which you do no longer stretch or compress the two axis.

2016-12-10 08:38:06 · answer #5 · answered by hume 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers