If you cannot practice your religion are you really free in America?

Question

For instance. Whether you believe in this practice or not.

It is illegal in Kentucky to use snakes (or any reptile) in a worship service, even if it puts no other person in any physical danger.

So, if the government can make laws that prohibit a religious practice. How free are we? Just for clarification, I do not believe in the practice of snake handling.

Answer 1

My religion has been hassled by the government tons of times. We normally win though =]. I don't think that there is such a thing as being truly free.

-Wiccan teen )O(

Answer 2

The question is more complicated than that. We are a democracy, not an anarchy, so there's always going to be some degree of government regulation. When it comes to religion, if the practices are not harming anyone, they should be perfectly legal. For instance, there were Muslims who were cutting their daughters' privates with rusty knives as part of some "Islamic tradition." That should be illegal. What you're talking about, is fine. The end.

Answer 3

Society has to balance the rights to participate in a religion vs. the harm that religion can cause. For example, voodun has use for cadavers, however, the uses to which they are put often desecrate the body and injure the living relatives, or worse, the parts are used in potions that are intended to be consumed. Could you imagine quaffing a nice potion of whatever that contained a piece of a fresh cadaver that was HIV Positive?

The simple fact is, every freedom is limited in some way. I may have the freedom to speak what I want, where I want, when I want, but if I yell 'FIRE!' in a crowded theatre, I deserve to be arrested.

Answer 4

Being the reliable language might imply that the federal government might best position within the English language. That might incorporate ballots for balloting and many others. one million. This is and regularly has been a various nation in which many languages and cultures are reward. That is a well factor. two. Our variety signifies that the one matters that bind us in combination are territory , the Constitution, and LANGUAGE. three. Nobody will have to be balloting right here if they do not talk our language besides. I might don't have any trade balloting in China or Germany considering that I do not talk the ones languages. four. It possibly one of a kind if there have been best 2 languages in query, however actually THERE ARE MANY LANGUAGES SPOKEN HERE BY IMMIGRANTS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD. We can't potentially be anticipated to study all of those languages or to spend our time and tax greenbacks translating matters that humans will have to be finding out to learn in English besides. five. This is NOT a Republican limitation and I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN. It is an American limitation.

Answer 5

The snake handleing is actually handling rattle snakes and the practice is letting the snake bite you to prove that you trust God to keep you from dieing. There are no laws prohibiting the practice of religion. We have freedom to practice our religions.

Answer 6

As long as the reason for the ban is not religious, and it is strictly related to the ban itself, then the fact there is a unintentional affect upon the religion is unfortunate, but not unconstitutional or un American. There are times when the government must enact laws to protect society and it's citizens.

Answer 7

yes, but it should be free for other groups too,

Some christian groups used to preach raise-hate, this hatrms others and should be illegal.

Also peoples safety has to be considerd, those snakes do kill people.

And this Leroy guy is talking crap, name me the group of islam that preached this? Because I can tell you the chriostian groups. The Kansasanti-gay preachers who pronounce race hat. And in the 50's the vaticant funded the IRA- a terrorist group an many chriatian churches used to fund the klu-klux clan.

Answer 8

Government has a duty to protect its citizens from harm. I would say that we're more free than citizens in other countries.

Answer 9

We're clearly are not 100% free, that's obvious. We have limits on freedom of speech, you can't libel, slander, yell fire in a crowded theater, perjure, etc... There are limits. There are limits to religious freedom. So we are 'relatively" free, not absolutely.

Answer 10

the government is using their power in order to " protect " the citizens from harming themselves. at least this is the way I understand this situation.