What's the best earthquake structural design?

Question

I need to know the best earthquake design for a rectangular building split into 4 levels with weighted "floor" plates in between for a Tech class. Basically, I'm asking for the best design for structural supports/ braces on the sides. Thanks!

The structure is made from thin wooden rods that are held together by glue. We don't cover them either, it's just the frame of a 14 inch tall about 4 inch wide rectangular frame. We add braces and supports to hold 4 1/4 in. thick metal "floors" that are inserted into the building before the test. I just need to know if I should use for example, small x's, large x's, a bunch of triangles, et cetra. Pics are also greatly appreciated.

Answer 1

Typically the best design depends on the type of structure. Is it wood, concrete, masonry or steel? Also, what wall openings are required and how tall are the stories?

Wood, masonry and concrete typically use shear walls while steel uses a moment frame or bracing.

Answer 2

You can both toughen a constructing in order that the surprise waves are not going to rationale the constructing to break down or you'll be able to construct on a platform of "surprise absorbers" which simply hose down the results of the quake. I feel the later is technically problematic however essentially the most victorious. In Japan they use "outriggers" to take a look at and avert cave in and help a constructing whether it is broken, but when the constructing and the outriggers each cave in then the field of harm is even bigger. There isn't any such factor as one hundred% earhtquake evidence.