2006-11-13 07:55:14 · 7 answers · asked by Alex 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
Sorry, I mean twenty to 35 year olds.
2006-11-13 08:02:15 · update #1
In the UK with National Health Care the problems of late childbearing are beginning to be debated. It would be easier there to intervene with flexible hours and bonuses for families so that later their health care system isn't flooded with problems of late childbearing.
2006-11-13 08:27:13 · update #2
No matter HOW much you get back, it comes NO where near the amount it takes to care for a child properly.
Clothes, food, activities, child care expenses, medical, dental, .. the list goes on and on.
2006-11-13 08:08:52 · answer #1 · answered by LittleBitOfSugar 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. In fact, we could use a new Baby Tax of $10,000.00 USD for every baby just to keep the population under control.
2006-11-13 16:23:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, we should use tax increases to discourage it. Have a kid, pay the tax (school) to support it. Property owners and business owners bear this burden but it should be parents.
2006-11-13 16:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Mere Exposure 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would anyone want to do that? There are already to many children having children.
2006-11-13 15:57:38 · answer #4 · answered by JB 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No let that be personal Lets not waste money on that
2006-11-13 16:06:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What on earth for? Please explain your reason for even asking such a question. I'm all ears?
2006-11-13 16:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WTF?? For you, or to tell other people? Either way, that is just wrong! And not everyone gets that much back if they have kids, i just get 1k but i have heard of people getting 6k. But don't do it... please!
2006-11-13 16:00:39 · answer #7 · answered by vetsmom_rgv 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋