In order to be a true Stigmatic, all the Stigmatic marks should not be able to be explained through events/occurrences during your lifetime, but instead, be of supernatural origin.
Unfortunately, you have had (by your own admission) had numerous events that caused the wounds that appear to look like they could be Stigmatic.
To decide merely the facts without deciding whether or not they may be explained by supernatural causes, history tells us that many ecstatics bear on hands, feet, side, or brow the marks of the Passion of Christ with "corresponding and intense sufferings".
There are 62 saints or blessed of both sexes of whom the best known (numbering twenty-six) were:
St. Francis of Assisi (1186-1226);
St. Lutgarde (1182-1246), a Cistercian;
St. Margaret of Cortona (1247-97);
St. Gertrude (1256-1302), a Benedictine;
St. Clare of Montefalco (1268-1308), an Augustinian;
Bl. Angela of Foligno (d. 1309), Franciscan tertiary;
St. Catherine of Siena (1347-80), Dominican tertiary;
St. Lidwine (1380-1433);
St. Frances of Rome (1384-1440);
St. Colette (1380-1447), Franciscan;
St. Rita of Cassia (1386-1456), Augustinian;
Bl. Osanna of Mantua (1499-1505), Dominican tertiary;
St. Catherine of Genoa (1447-1510), Franciscan tertiary;
Bl. Baptista Varani (1458-1524), Poor Clare;
Bl. Lucy of Narni (1476-1547), Dominican tertiary;
Bl. Catherine of Racconigi (1486-1547), Dominican;
St. John of God (1495-1550), founder of the Order of Charity;
St. Catherine de' Ricci (1522-89), Dominican;
St. Mary Magdalene de' Pazzi (1566-1607), Carmelite;
Bl. Marie de l'Incarnation (1566-1618), Carmelite;
Bl. Mary Anne of Jesus (1557-1620), Franciscan tertiary;
Bl. Carlo of Sezze (d. 1670), Franciscan;
Blessed Margaret Mary Alacoque (1647-90), Visitandine (who had only the crown of thorns);
St. Veronica Giuliani (1600-1727), Capuchiness;
St. Mary Frances of the Five Wounds (1715-91), Franciscan tertiary.
There were 20 stigmatics in the nineteenth century. The most famous were:
Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824), Augustinian;
Elizabeth Canori Mora (1774-1825), Trinitarian tertiary;
Anna Maria Taïgi (1769-1837);
Maria Dominica Lazzari (1815-48);
Marie de Moerl (1812-68) and Louise Lateau (1850-83), Franciscan tertiaries.
The facts having been set forth, it remains to state the explanations that have been offered. Some physiologists, both Catholics and Free-thinkers, have maintained that the wounds might be produced in a purely natural manner by the sole action of the imagination coupled with lively emotions. The person being keenly impressed by the sufferings of the Saviour and penetrated by a great love, this preoccupation acts on her or him physically, reproducing the wounds of Christ. This would in no wise diminish his or her merit in accepting the trial, but the immediate cause of the phenomena would not be supernatural.
As all of your marks can be explained by natural (although unfortunate) events, it would be safe to say that you do NOT have a true Stigmata.
2006-11-13 08:14:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bob 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I need a picture, otherwise this is just hearsay. Do you have a picture of yourself? God Bless
I don't know what it is, but I will say this... you are given this for a reason. I think these things can be answered in prayer.
You can email me if you want. Are you ok? It sounds painful. It could be a sign from God. I don't know. I've only seen the movie Stigmata, that's the only time I've heard of anything like that. I think prayer.... yes prayer... you are definitely not schitzo. God bless.
2006-11-13 07:07:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you have marks on your hands it definitely not Stigmata. The hands of a human would not have supported the body weight, it would have been your wrists. So I'm sorry, I don't believe you
2006-11-13 07:20:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Black Dragon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If this isn't a gigantic leg pull (and the Irish are known for playing jokes on people -- certainly the leprechauns are avid joke players) there are a number of parapsychological institutes that would appreciate talking to you.
2006-11-13 07:06:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by old lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
All that means, if it means anything, is for you to consider the pain these or any wounds inflicted upon you, and the reminder that the scars give you. I mean, why do we scar at all? A child under the age of two is capable of growing an entire digit if they lose it. It is for you to contemplate upon.
2006-11-13 07:24:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
0⤊
0⤋