English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

13th century before Christ.

when the Pharoah Ramses(II)ruled.

2006-11-13 04:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by Green Lantern 4 · 0 1

You forgot something of the scripture (certainly the beginning up of the scripture) which tells me your merely pastime is to curl it. It is going: "In being fatherless, motherless, with out relatives tree, having...... Melchizedek, all of us be attentive to, had a father and a mom, as he became into human, and he probable had a relatives tree, ancestors of direction, yet possibly descendants besides --- the difficulty is, the Bible does not specify, so from the author's attitude, Paul's it is, he had no beginning up or end, etc. there is not any checklist of him inheriting the priesthood by using his lineage and none showing it is end, so too Jesus, has no checklist inheriting the priesthood (he became into of the tribe of Judah, the priests have been of Levi) and the bible does talk of him having no successor. EDIT --- you're pulling one million fact out of the scripture and brushing off something. you say that he did not have a beginning up yet yet you be attentive to he did have a mom and a father and ancestors, in different words, you recommend that one million section is literal something is symbolic. EDIT 2 --- certainly, the verse is speaking approximately Melchizedek, and that's my ingredient. look at verses one million and a couple of and you will see that, then in verse 4 it speaks of Abraham having dealings with him, it is all speaking with regard to the guy Melchizedek. And it keeps to bypass on approximately his priesthood till now even bringing Jesus into the communicate. became into Melchizedek made similar to the Son of God (in verse 3), he did not have a prior existence, etc. the finished concern is symbolic, with the aid of fact the final verse of financial disaster 6 states: in accordance to the variety (or, order) of Melchizedek. in case you examine the finished financial disaster, Paul factors out why he makes the assessment. EDIT 3 --- by making use of ways, I make an apology for incinuating which you have been twisting the scripture, it is merely that lots of do here on Yahoo, i will now see you probably did not have that purpose. And sturdy communicate, perhaps sooner or later we will meet and could have it throughout lower back.

2016-10-17 05:38:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It seems that Jacob's family (which became the nation of Israel) moved to Egypt in 1728 BCE and began the Exodus 215 years later, in 1513 BCE.

Interestingly, Moses immediately began recording the book of Genesis. Thus the bible began to be written in 1513 BCE as well.

Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/lmn/article_03.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/rq/article_01.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/pr/article_03.htm

2006-11-14 08:55:48 · answer #3 · answered by achtung_heiss 7 · 0 1

I calculated all that one time based on the geneology given in the Bible, but recently I found out that the calendars of that time ran at a different rate than those of today. Then add in that to God, a day is like a thousand years and a thousand years like a day ---- Who knows what the Biblical account is really showing as far as the dating???

2006-11-13 04:29:45 · answer #4 · answered by BaseballGrrl 6 · 0 2

And more importantly -- why is there not a LICK of archeological evidence for it? Why did it take thousands of people 40 YEARS to travel what would have taken even a heavily laden caravan only 12 days?

2006-11-13 04:29:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

According to the Bible, it was the first reckoning of time by Moses.

"This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: it shall be the first month of the year to you..." --Exodus 12:2.

Peace be with you.

2006-11-13 04:31:09 · answer #6 · answered by Arf Bee 6 · 0 2

2448 from creation....or approximately 1313 BCE

2006-11-13 04:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 0 2

What history book are you reading?

2006-11-13 04:27:46 · answer #8 · answered by hope 5 · 0 2

All i know is that it was bc. It has no impact on my life so it is not important to me.

2006-11-13 04:28:22 · answer #9 · answered by Osunwole Adeoyin 5 · 0 3

1513 B.C.

2006-11-13 04:37:16 · answer #10 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers