English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As we all have known, the various people have written differing accounts - some being contradictory or seeming unreasonable. Part of adopting a religion...finding your own belief, is to decide for yourself which writings you will believe and how much of them you will accept as being true for YOU. There are many "right" beliefs, and even some of what I may feel are "wrong" may not be too wrong.

The people who accept every word & comma of their bible simply are not aware of the history of the making of their bible...or do not care to become aware. There is no proof of when any Bible stories were written for a number of reasons. Eg, due to illiteracy at the time, they would have been passed down orally for generations before being written down. We do not have the original manuscripts as all the biblical manuscripts known are copies. And many more.

If i'm a muslim could agree in some of the bible verses, would you agree too with The Holy Quran?

I guess the ans is no right?

2006-11-13 03:21:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Even with all the scientific proof and evidence? The ans still not. The reason is intolerance to others. Your history teaches us that. Does that an eg. To love thy neighbour or To love even your enemies?

2006-11-13 03:29:15 · update #1

11 answers

Do your good deeds in this life brother. God showed me the truth, and he is speaking to us in that book called Quran.

Torah and Bible are books from God, but went thru many translation errors. also who gives the right for John to put a single word inside the Bible? the Bible has to be shut down at the moment Jesus is gone, instead years later someone come and put words in the Bible, this is suppose to be a holy Book Not a Note-Book.

for the Quran:
1st) anyone read the Quran in its original language will know ride away that is from his lord, it's a language that no human can write it like that.

2) Muhammad cannot read or write, no way he can write the Quran, neither read the Bible or Torah.

3) Muhammad words collected in a book called "Hadith". God words collected in a book called "Quran". if you compare Muhammad words with God words, you will see alot of differences, it's absolutly not the same identity, completly different identities.

4) if you still have more doubt, then find out who is the God that Jesus used to worship by his Aramaic language. (type the word God)
http://www.peshitta.org/lexicon/

2006-11-13 03:46:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The Injil got here first, which used to be converted through the Romans into Bible. But essentially the most correct of the Holy Books is the Quran...there isn't something in it that you'll be able to contradict. The fundamental change among the 2 I think is what faith respectively that they're used for. The fundamental similarity is they each come from the identical God, the Islam God, that's.

2016-09-01 11:47:09 · answer #2 · answered by penaloza 4 · 0 0

well i do need to point that mohammed also didnt write down any of his sayings his followers did that

i have a quesiton for you have you read the Bible
i am a christian and i have read parts of the Quran
i do agree with some of the Qurans teachings but have you noticed that there are many contradictions of the Quran it says that killing is bad and that you shouldnt kill
then it says that you should kill all of the jews and nonbelievers

that is a big contradiction

now unlike you i am not trying to cut down the Quran it is a historical book and i respect it
so please try to have the same courticy with the Bible

I dont know what you have against the Bible I mean it doesnt tell us to kill people

and the answer is yes if the Quran tells me something that i believe is right then i will acknowledge it

2006-11-13 05:29:10 · answer #3 · answered by ~♥ LilPink ♥~ 2 · 1 0

History & Archeology PROVE you wrong

Have you hear of the Dead sea Scroll
Have you read History texts from the Romans, The Jews, The Egyptions

We DO have parts of the original New Testament in museams across the world

P.S. Just because the Koran is not accepted as Inspired does not mean we do not love you.

2006-11-13 03:35:37 · answer #4 · answered by williamzo 5 · 1 1

My Truth is Jesus Christ and Him alone. The Holy Scriptures teach of Him and I accept that. I accept the Holy Bible as Truth - it is "God breathed" - totally inspired by God - but penned by man. As far as the Quran - I do not believe it because I do not believe it is the Word of God. It comes down to Jesus versus Mohammed for me - Jesus is alive and sits the right hand of the Father. He died, was buried, resurrected - no grave - the hinge of my faith. Mohammed died - remains dead - there is a grave. Also Allah is not the One True God - Jehovah/Yahweh. You know this to be true. I worship the One True God - the Great I AM. This is not my Truth - but God's Truth - very very different.

2006-11-13 03:26:35 · answer #5 · answered by jworks79604 5 · 2 0

The historians and the critics have opined that the Bible has been added, deleted or its facts concealed, as you have rightly mentioned.

I reproduce some of the opinions of the famous historians.

" We do not know of any book in the whole world less authenticated as to date, authers' names or tradition than our own christian Bible "--[ Isis Unveiled by Blavatsky, vol. II, p-277 ]

" Jesus our teacher has left no writings about himself."--[ The Writings of Origen by Frederick Crombie, Vol I, pg-445 ]

"......Furthermore it is declared that the coming of Mohammad under the name of 'AHMAD' and that his name is specifically recorded in 'TAWRAH' and 'INJIL' as the prophet of GENTILES [ an-nabi, ul-ummi, interprated by later orthodox as the 'unlettered prophet'] Nevertheless, the Jews [ and perhaps by implication, THECHRISTIANS ALSO SEEK TO CONCEAL the witness of thier scriptures and are guilty of misquoting and even wilfully perverting them."--[Moahammadanism, An Historical Survey, by Hamilton A.R.GIBB,pg-53]

The coming of Muhammad had been foretold in many scriptures but these scriptures including Bible were moulded to coceal the facts.

Look what Henry Stubbe had to say in this regard;

" Deut. XXXiii-2, God is said to have come from 'Sinai', to have appeared in 'Sier' and manifested himself in 'Paran'which they interpret that God gave the Law to Moses in 'Sinai', that in 'Sier' which are mountains near Jerusalem, he gave the Gospel to 'Isa' and thereby further illustrated the Law [ in token of which 'Isa' himself was circumcised and he himself said that he came not to destroy the Law of Moses but to confirm it], lastly they say that by 'Paran' are meant the mountains near Meccah, where the same Law was perfected and magnified by thier prophet Mahomet, who is the fullness of the Law of God."--
[ An Account of The Rise And Progress of Mahometanism with the life of Mahomet- by HENRY STUBBE, M.A. of Christ Church- Oxford, From a manuscript copied by Charles Hornby of Pipe office in 1705, London,Luzac & Co. 1911, pg-87 ]


The cause of the dramatic success of Islam was spiritual as well as social and political. On this importent point GIBBON testifies, " More pure than the system of Zoroaster, more liberal than the Laws of Moses, the religion of Mohammad might seem less inconsistent with reason than the creed of mystery and superstition which in the 7th century, DISGRACED THE SIMPLICITY OF THE GOSPEL."Decline and Fall of Roman Empire,by Gibbon.

There are several acconts which indicates and bear witness to the fact that the Bible which we see today, is not what the God wanted it to be.

While on the other hand Quran is having only one version since begining and has been able to protect its sanctity and originality all over the world.

But you can not change the beliefs of the people. They have all the right in the world to thier beliefs.

Though one day the truth is sure to surface.

2006-11-13 04:11:01 · answer #6 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 0 0

Truth is truth. It doesn't matter the source. The devil mixes truth in with his lies to make them more convincing. The Bible is my initial source for truth, but if there is truth in the Quran I can acknowledge that. I mean, I don't have to believe in Santa to say that it is true that there is snow at the north pole. But... acknowledging one piece of truth in something does not make the whole thing true.

2006-11-13 03:32:12 · answer #7 · answered by BaseballGrrl 6 · 0 0

When Muhammed was inventing islam and allah, he specifically denied the devine nature of Jesus, the Son of the one true God.

Knowing this about the false god islam, how could a Christian "agree" with anything in the quran? But, assume for just one moment that it was possible, what person with any common sense or knowledge of history, science, religion (Judaism, Christianity), astronomy, etc etc etc would take Muhammed seriously for even a second?

2006-11-13 03:36:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

There is much in the Koran that is very Scriptural.

But it only takes a little poison do make a well unusable.

2006-11-13 03:27:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I serve the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The Alpha/Omega, beginning and the end, King of Kings, Lord of Lords, Name ABOVE ALL NAMES, the great IAM!! MY GOD IS ALL LOVE, MERCIFUL, WONDERFUL, COUNSELOR, AUTHOR OF SALVATION!! HE CONQUERED DEATH AND THE GRAVE! GLORY TO YOU MY LORD!!

2015-08-22 11:47:22 · answer #10 · answered by Loretta 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers