Are Islamic Fundamentalist nations starting a war of civilisations? Are they denouncing all other religions?

Question

Why has Islamic Fundamentalism become so powerful that it now threatens world peace?

Answer 1

Muslims murder 3,000 innocents in New York and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 202 tourists in Bali and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 333 schoolchildren and their teachers in Beslan and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 292 innocents, mainly Kenyans and Tanzanians at two US Embassies and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 241 US and 58 French peacekeepers in Beirut and expect no criticism.
Muslims fire 4,000 Katyusha rockets into Northern Israel killing over 50 innocent civilians and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 52 in London and 191 in Madrid and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 200 in Mumbai and expect no criticism.
Muslims behead Western hostages in Iraq, Buddhist monks in Thailand and Christian schoolgirls in Indonesia and expect no criticism.
Muslims murder 500,000 in Darfur and expect no criticism.
Muslims regard Jews as 'sons of pigs and monkeys', and vow to nuke Israel and expect no criticism.
Muslims force women to wear hideous sacks, stone to death women for getting raped and for leaving the home unescorted, engage in honor killings of sisters and daughters for unapproved dating, and expect no criticism.
Muslims danced in the streets and handed out sweets to their kids to celebrate the 9/11 atrocity, and still expected no criticism.
Since 9/11 Muslims have killed over 26,000 and wounded over 50,000 in terrorist attacks worldwide since 9/11 and expect no criticism.

Since 9/11 Muslims have committed terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Chad, Chechnya, Dagestan, Denmark, East Timor, Egypt, England, Eritrea, Ethiopia, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Ingushetia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Jordan-Iraq, Kabardino-Balkans, Kenya, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Mauritania, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan, Gaza-Palestinian Authority, Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Scotland, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Arab Republic, United States, Uzbekistan and Yemen, and still expect no criticism.

Muslims have carried out over 5,800 fatal terrorist atrocities since 9/11, and countless thousands since Islamic conquest began in 623 AD and expect no criticism. But if a Pope dares to tell the truth about Islam or Danes publish cartoons about Mohammed, then let the outpourings of Islamic hate and outrage begin.

Answer 2

In the past decade almost all Islamic revivalist movements have been labeled fundamentalists, whether they be of extremist or moderate origin. The widespread impact of the term is obvious from the following quotation from one of the most influential Encyclopedias under the title 'Fundamentalist': "The term fundamentalist has ... been used to describe members of militant Islamic groups." Why would the media use this specific word, so often with relation to Muslims?
Before the term fundamentalist was branded for Muslims, it was, and still is, being used by certain Christian denominations. Most of them are radical Baptist, Lutheran and Presbyterian groups. The Southern Baptist Convention is one such group, they take pride in being called the Fundamentalists. Because, according the them, they have gone back to the fundamentals of Christianity. They preach absolute Biblical inerrency and Millenarianism (belief in the physical return of Christ to establish a 1000 year reign). These radical groups form only a minute minority of the total Christian population, although they may be the most vocal. They want the Church to be the only authority. This reminds the modern man of the Dark Ages in Europe when the Church was in fact supreme.
What most of these groups don't realize is that the term Fundamentalist is actually derived from a series of essays published from 1910 to 1915 under the title The Fundamentals by British and American evangelists. The purpose of this 12-volume collection was to determine which churches, according to the authors, held up to genuine Christian doctrine and the ones that did not. Nevertheless the term Fundamentalist, in the Christian world, is synonymous with the 'Bible Thumpers' and the tele evangelists.

To apply the same terminology to Muslims is neither fair nor valid. Because in the case of Islam all Muslims believe in absolute inerrency of the Quran, since it is a basic Islamic tenet. Therefore the media would have to use the word fundamentalist for all Muslims! which it does not do. It only uses the word Fundamentalist for both the extremist and terrorist groups, and the true moderate Islamic revivalist movements. Both these definitions are incompatible with each other. Using the word fundamentalist for the former may be acceptable, since it does have some parallel to the Christian definition. But if that definition is to be used, however, then using the same word to describe the latter would be erroneous and completely unacceptable. It is this dual definition that is unfair to the Islamic faith. Therefore the media should either stop using the word Fundamentalist to describe any and all Islamic organizations, or be much more careful in its usage.

Answer 3

Wars have been started against them, and the future wars planned, almost announced. The Muslims are defending. Sometime by a personal sacrifice, such as, a suicidal attack; since they have no other weapon to fight against aggression.
Every religion of the world, including the Asker's, does believe in the superiority of own religion. The immature priests of every religion just take up denunciation of others.

Answer 4

I've always heard that the Israelis do this by saying that their nation is God's chosen no other nation matters, what other explanation would work for their war on Lebanon?

Ans how can Islamic nations denounce other faiths if they're not allowed to one force their faiths on other and they haveto respect their neighbours regardless of their faith.

A common story for this would be of their prohet's neighbour who I think was meant to be a jew and he never treated her wrong regardless of how much she insulted and he looked after her when he found out she was ill.

Now if muslims are meant to follow thta example I'd say your question is baseless.

Answer 5

uh hello...

The US has attacked and invaded and subverted and destroyed more countries than even Chengez Khan.

Go read history. It is not Islamic nations that threaten world peace. Those who subverted the Kyoto Protocol, the World Court, The Missile Defence Treaty and the Non-Proliferation Treaty are the real danger to the world.

USA vetoed all resolutions and its dependants Israel, Micronesia and Malensia were the only ones who abstained from ratifying them.

Answer 6

A religion takes the characteristics of the culture of the people among whom it is practised. The Arab world is rugged place, where life is hard. Unruliness has been norm and the religion founded by Prophet Mohamed tried to imposed many rigors to discipline them. The demands of the religion manifests itself in myriad ways. Fundamentalism should be regarded as having cropped from out of these rigors of the religious teaching and the practices of the people professing the religion.

Answer 7

The fact that you blame Islam for the threat to world peace is not only delusional on your behalf.It shows how far from the truth you really are.

Answer 8

They are fighting back against the George W. Bush policies. He is the cause of most of it. Face it, people-------------look at all he has tried to change in America, to fit his religious beliefs. Scary.

As they say-for every terrorist George kills 5 take his place. He policies have been disastrous.

Answer 9

How would YOU feel !
After 1300 years ;

33 percent Christians
21 percent Muslims
16 percent Atheists

(u can check Wikipedia)

It does get FRUSTRATING , KNOWING
Allah KNOWS IT ALL .. and indeed
considers OTHERS INFIDELS .....

thats why CASTRO 'S MUM called him
FIDEL , so I am TOLD .....

Answer 10

No they are not, as usual the USA is terrorising the world.