2006-11-12 22:42:31 · 8 answers · asked by Kenz 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Historians don't believe that King David existed and many are skeptical that Jesus did as well. But several hundred years seperated them.
2006-11-12 22:49:37 · answer #1 · answered by Cinnamon 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
David was about 1000 years before Christ, Abraham was 2,000 years BC Moses about 1500 BC and David 1000.
2006-11-13 06:55:06 · answer #2 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be King David first, and it's hundreds of years.
2006-11-13 06:43:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was actually born in 4bc and David ascended the throne in approx 1000bc - so you have a thousand years, give or take a few
2006-11-13 07:03:08 · answer #4 · answered by conda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Urm, I hate to point this out, but wasn't he only related to Kind David on his step-father's side? If he was born of God then he was only related through his mother's marriage.
2006-11-13 06:49:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the time gap varies from the gospel of luke to mathew. isn't it surprising that such chronological details are irrevocably different in a book supposed to be from god?
2006-11-13 06:51:59 · answer #6 · answered by irumporayar 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Forty generations
2006-11-13 06:43:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
close to 1500- years
2006-11-13 06:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by devora k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋