Keep in mind that you might not be an expert in the other person's religion!
2006-11-12 22:29:59 · 29 answers · asked by . 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hell, no; I wouldn't, ma'am.
I'm more comfy going "Duhhh huhhhh?" with all those guys out there who love to throw tons of "Religious" words at you.
Heck, somebody said something thousands of years ago; and how does that mean they're right?
Though I'd say that the person who's asking "logical" questions about my Religion needs to remember that when you point a finger at someone else, three of your fingers are pointing back at you!?
It just ain't right, ifn you ask me, to mock anybody's Faith.
And if you want to get the other person to appreciate your point of view, then the best thing for you to do is to respect his perspective and show him that respect. That way, he'll try to understand and respect yours.
But, heyyyy, I'm no Expert.
All the best.
Have a nice day.
2006-11-13 00:29:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me personally no I would not attack theirs in response to me not knowing my own religion well enough. I am the first to tell someone I don't know the answer. I am not a scholar I am just a lay person doing my best to study my own religion. If a person is not an expert in their own religion they should not try to be one in someone else's religion. But thats just my opinion.
2006-11-13 07:28:03 · answer #2 · answered by Umm Ali 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but some of the questions aren't logical. Usually, the attacks are because the person isn't an expert, and doesn't know how to react to the question.
2006-11-12 22:35:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey salam sister!
I also think that most of the people are just not complete in their own religion basics but are still poking nose into others religions...
They keep on asking stupid questions & keep trying to insult others....
I wish those people are showed the right path & they themselves be able to absorb the truth!
Allah Bless You my Sister!
Allahafiz!
2006-11-12 22:48:17 · answer #4 · answered by just curious 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No; I don't feel the need to attack someone else's religion. I know enough about my own religion, and am comfortable with the things that I believe and why I believe them that I would not have an issue with an individual asking me about it. As long as they don't try to force their religion on me, they are quite welcome to believe whatever they wish, as far as I am concerned.
2006-11-12 22:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But you sound like one when it comes to Christianity! The hole you fall into is when person compare the best of their religion to the worst of the other. Invariabley, you come out on top! Quit using the Bible, which is a lie to you, to contradict the Bible!
2006-11-12 22:46:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that is against the spirit of Islam, against the spirit of da'wah (invitation).
"You shall invite to the path of your Lord with wisdom and kind enlightenment, and debate with them in the best possible manner. Your Lord knows best who has strayed from His path, and He knows best who are the guided ones." Quran 16:125
If I do not know an answer, I have the dignity and respect to admit that I do not know. That is more honrable that lying or worse, attacking the person for even asking the question.
A classic divertion tactic I see in Yahoo! Answers is "Jesus Loves You" or "You're going to hell!" for simple questions that shake their very foundations.
Alhamdulillah, the Muslims have been dignified in their responses in here so far.
2006-11-12 22:36:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unless I knew what I was talking about, I'd keep my mouth shut!
Anyway, if I didn't have any knowledge of my own, what right would I have in the first place to say anything to anyone else?
2006-11-13 04:35:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My concern with your good judgment is that your first premise "that the declare that God exists" can not be proved. the foundation for this could nicely be a rejection of the Bible and the two its historicity, and the prophesies that are the middle to the residing evidence that is seen in history and in the worldwide right this moment. collectively as many books of religion are one source information, (Buddha, e book of Mormon, Koran) the Bible stands proud in that that's dozens of writers, throughout the time of almost 1600 years, that are needed for totally be attentive to-how the entire. To me it is the "evidence" which you reject. the common call for that God stop by making use of the residing house and talk over with you in my view that many atheists and agnostics require for evidence is approximately as lifelike with the aid of fact the demands for Obama to stop by making use of your place and clarify how the hot medical gadget will earnings you. IF Mr. Obama could reject that decision for, what makes every physique think of that God ought to be extra compliant to such demands?
2016-10-17 05:25:35 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that would not accomplish anything...
"He who abuses his abuser is the worse of the two. To refrain from retaliation is to win a battle hard to win. If one knows that the other person is angry but refrains from anger oneself, one does what is best for oneself and the other person also. One is a healer of both"
- Buddha -
2006-11-12 22:31:47 · answer #10 · answered by Shinkirou Hasukage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋