2006-11-12 18:57:25 · 5 answers · asked by horensen 4 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
They are two different things, both related to photography.
Aperture is the opening, also called diaphragm where the light enters to strike the film and forms an image.
The International Standard Organization, (ISO) gave standars to photography in relation to film sensitivity, so every manufacturer will have in their films the same result as his competitor and we photographers will have no problem in our light calculations.
2006-11-13 00:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by bigonegrande 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1/64 stop ISO. They are built stronger and have little things like 100% viewfinder coverage, things like that. But when you get down to what is truly different about the more expensive cameras is control on the part of the operator. On my $600 camera I have full stops of ISO, 100,200,400,800,1600. On a $8000 camera it can do 200,210,245,261,274,298,312,....I joke a little about it but what that does is lets you make it just ever so slightly darker or brighter etc. Yes a lens is important for good pictures, the body is garbage and worthless in comparison. A good lens on a shoebox with film will make a better picture than a D3x with a bad lens. No, Photoshop can not make a picture look better if it is a bad picture. Photoshop enhances, not creates.
2016-03-28 03:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aperture is the amount of light that is let in through the lens when taking a picture & the ISO is the film speed (ie, 200, 400).
2006-11-12 19:05:53 · answer #3 · answered by Cruella Twist 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aperture is the size of the hole through which light is let through, measured in f-stops. ISO is the film speed, for example ISO (or ASA) 200 or 400.
2006-11-12 19:00:37 · answer #4 · answered by aas_627 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Aperture is like the size of the 'eye', and the ISO the speed of the 'blink'. to use an analogy
2006-11-12 19:32:23 · answer #5 · answered by SAINT G 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋