Are the Generals worried about their future employment? Do you think they should be?

Question

The present top brass were all *** kissing Bush, Chenny, & Rummy.
All of a sudden, future employment will be based on performance, NOT *** kissing.
EXTRA QUESTION,
What do you think the rank & file are saying about the policy makers? Is there an END STATE yet decided for this war?

Answer 1

The Game of the Generals is who is on top but the top had already changed. Thus, they are in a precarious position now because the Democrats are now in control of the military positioning according to promotions, movements and budget.

Answer 2

Department of the Army Select (DA Select for those who know) is a process done through Congress. Of course, Bush, Rumsfeld, and Harvey will put in his preferred choices for consideration. This is not an "*** kissing" process, and the process is based on records and experience in given fields.

The Generals will only serve for a 2 to 3 years in a given area as a general rule. Most officer positions work that way. As mentioned above, these higher ranking Generals are required to have experience in given areas in order to over see certain missions. They simply can not walk in from anywhere to fill any position. By the time an officer makes 0-5, it's expected they have a thesis in place to forge the direction and purpose of their career.

The military service is only concerned with achieving the goals set forth, not politics. The goals are set by the civilian authorities and the military conducts operations that ensures the goals are achieved. That's the name of the game.

The military was concerned about the democrat take over in congress. Not because 'they are Democrats,' but the fear of gridlock over the process of the war and how lives will be lost if the president and congress can not see eye to eye on funding and support of the operations to achieve the goals. This is not a political football to be used. This isn't a game.

Please consider this before making the military a political joke.

Answer 3

By the time someone makes general, they most likely have a cushy private sector retirement job lined up already, so it really makes no material difference to the top brass. I think the coalition forces will be more of a rapid reaction force and act as the hammer when Iraqi forces get in over their heads, rather than acting independently from here on in. I imagine there will be coalition forces in Iraq indefinitely, but if the Democrats play their cards right and GWB agrees, they can perhaps have troops from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc. help out in Iraq.

Answer 4

A prevalent discharge (honorable) should be overturned with an worry-free letter of request. you've ninety days after your ETS to post the letter. and also you'll recieve it about months after your ETS. about seventy 5% of all requests are established. with a view to reply to your queston, NO. in no way, structure or style will that outcome the alternative making approach of your potential organization see you later as you get it became into an honorable.

Answer 5

Well as the Generals HAVE to follow orders from the government they are fulfilling their employment thus whats's your issue? You would rather they commit treason?

Answer 6

President Bush is the Commander and Chief, look it up.

Answer 7

unless you would like their job don't worry about it