do is eat each other to survive - I'm not responsible?
2006-11-12 07:16:59 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
get some professional help
2006-11-12 07:23:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eating, drinking, breathing are baseing need or Human. All religious are teaching us to have it less as we can. The emotion are concluding surround with family members, lover, and friends will be the last. Confussie teaching us as a inter circle to exter circle, such as parents, brothers, sister, lover, son and daughter then is relatives and friends. In the ancient society; the food are not enough, people become selfish from internal family to friend, then is not comparsion to other people. The hollyman will teach us to share but refused by some people holding to save for future.
I can say that the holly man teaching will be a coin of 2 faces. One side is good to people and other side may not.
We look into all the religious in the world are full of mistakes excluding Tantra. The intellengence are in the normal living. There is merely you cannot find a mistake unless you cannot obtain meaning from it.
Return to your question; mostly the surviver are killing each other untill the last.
2006-11-12 15:31:46 · answer #2 · answered by johnkamfailee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because they knew it would happen...if i told you to sit down and not get up for the next hour or i would take away all your money and you got up and i took all your money ...you would blame me? you knew it would happen, you were given simple instructions and told the consequences ahead of time...if you refused to do the simple tasks you CHOSE the consequence thats not god's fault you chose you take responsibility
2006-11-12 15:21:29 · answer #3 · answered by Robert K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no idea where you got that notion...but I'm afraid you would be horribly responsible...
I do hope you are not actually thinking of doing any such thing!!
EDIT:
The other day, when I noticed this question, I had not yet seen all your other questions leading you here. Interesting, isn't it, how one line taken out of context can be so misunderstood....
2006-11-12 15:19:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sorry if I am of the mark here but are you suggesting that God takes away peoples food? if so I think you are very wrong.
God has provided all the fruits of the earth for our sustenance and expects us to share with one another, isn`t it the greedy and the selfish who are at fault.
2006-11-12 15:25:43 · answer #5 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you must be a very angry person to be attacking people like thinks, I not a Christian but I find it sad that you are doing this.
Atheists I know believe in respecting others with different view points. They might disagree and debate but to use cheep attacks as your previous questions lean too they would not do.
your attitude speaks poorly for you as a person.
2006-11-12 15:22:30 · answer #6 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes you are responsible if you are the one who actually took their food away from them.
2006-11-12 15:40:54 · answer #7 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you want to steal a family's food, my dear??
Of course you are responsible for the consequence of your actions....did someone tell you otherwise??
2006-11-12 15:19:15 · answer #8 · answered by judge_smails_sir 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
This defense never worked in our justice system, society made me do it so society is to blame.
2006-11-12 15:21:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, are you trying to make a metaphor of capitalism? That one's good.
2006-11-12 15:19:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋