No British soldier would!
2006-11-12 03:03:02 · 35 answers · asked by maddogs ghost 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I would. The Brits wouldn't because they are P ussies
2006-11-12 03:18:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You're an absolute idiot. How is a woman with a bomb strapped to her "unarmed"? If you're going to be a troll, at least ask a question that makes sense.
Oh, and I guess that would be one dead British soldier then, huh?
2006-11-12 06:23:12 · answer #2 · answered by PaulHolloway1973 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey numb nuts, how can a terrorist be considered unarmed if she has a bomb strapped to herself.
If we had the technology I would be sending out radio waves that were capable of detonating such bombs every 5 or 10 minutes or so, thereby such bombs would be blowing up at unplanned times and locations and hopefully killing not only the bomb making terrorist's but also the scumbags who are hiding and aiding them.
That would be so cool to sit off in the distance and hear some bomb blow up and know that a room full of would be assassin's were on the 76 virgins and a camel express.
In reality I do believe such technology exists, but due to liberal pressure and thought that innocent people might be hurt, we do not employ such technology. Instead you hear of the roadside bombs that kill our troops which is much more acceptable to the enemies of our country.
2006-11-12 03:50:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
First of all as stated she isn't unarmed. How much more armed do you have to be?! And he probably wouldn't have to shoot her, he's going to blow up with her in all liklihood. And last I'd like to believe our soldiers spotting an 'unarmed' woman strapped with a bomb might think to themselves " Gee, she might kill a bunch of people and since I'm suppose to protect the people maybe it would be an idea to not let her!!!!" Oh my, I'm glad your British soldiers aren't really like you say.
2006-11-12 03:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by Brianne 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sorry honey, the bomb on her chest makes her armed whether she put it there or not. Usually when the soldiers see stuff like that, they're looking for the coward man with the detonator who's usually hiding behind a rock waiting for her to get close enough. They'll keep their sights on the woman, but given the chance, they'll shoot first at the man with the button.
2006-11-12 06:18:55 · answer #5 · answered by desiderio 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You think not? How in the world is someone, man or woman, "unarmed" if they have a bomb strapped on? Seems to be having a bomb makes one armed.
And you think a British soldier would die or allow his mates to die for this? Rubbish, childish rubbish.
2006-11-12 03:10:42 · answer #6 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
IF it is determined that the woman is a participant of her own making and not a "hostage" and it is safer to shoot or explode her in her current surroundings rather than let her reach her intended target then what choice would you have but to open fire and control the situation,for a less casulties outcome.a british soldier is under a commanding officer,as any army worth its salt is,and would undergo training for this occurence.
2006-11-12 03:41:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would be interested on which facts you base your argument, and how is someone carrying a bomb unarmed?
Of course a British soldier would shoot a suicide bomber, whatever sex if the lives of civilians or colleagues depended on their actions.
2006-11-12 03:10:42 · answer #8 · answered by bazranz 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'll answer that with this.
three guys were trying out for Delta force, they came to the last portion of the PSYC exam when posed with a question. If you were given an assingment, set up your sniper rifle and saw the target walk out a door and it was your mother, what would you feel.
The first said he didn't know what he'd feel other than "confusion and conflicted and didn't think he could do it".
The second said he'd feel like "no matter what he couldn't do it".
The third replied "RECOIL", any more targets?
I'm like that third guy, it's a bomb, shes armed, I'd feel recoil.
2006-11-12 03:14:55 · answer #9 · answered by Lrscghost 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First off she is not unarmed like everyone else has pointed out,duh! Then as far as would she be shot,it's called eliminating a threat. Just remember if it wasn't for the so called "Brave Americans" you could be speaking German,or did you forget that.
2006-11-12 03:34:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
If she has a bomb around her she is not unarmed.
I think every soldier would shot that women if she
a)is a treat to any other human .
b)if she is a treat to the soldier it self
and of course you wouldn`t because you like to get blown up?
ok whatever ....as long you have fun beeing blown up.
so long
2006-11-12 04:01:52 · answer #11 · answered by Sunshine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋