And if God was no thing but image or imagination...no solid matter ...in the beginning, and then God became solid matter and image both, was this not a separation of God into this materialized state of being solid and not solid both, hence omnipresent? So that material cannot actually be divided from the spirit of that material? This illusion of separation God from God original state of no thing ness, is this not Sin? Missing the mark of no thing originalness? Difference from it's original state?
2006-11-12 02:50:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Your statement/question is presumptive, full of fragmented, wild-conjecture and bombast. It is also full of contradiction in its attempt to persuade, by buttressing different beliefs on your part to support your claims, in the efforts to lead to one goal. Are you schizophrenic, or do you suffer from mania in any manner? Please do not conclude that my views from my ANSWER, are in any way meant to demean or ridicule people suffering from these unfortunate chemical imbalances/maladies. I was just curious.
2006-11-12 03:04:31 · answer #1 · answered by For sure 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are imagining that there is some fundemental difference between "matter" and "energy", which, if you paid attention in physics class, you would know to be untrue. While it is true that to our minds and bodies, the world around you seems to be made of solid "stuff", it simply isn't.
Since "sin" is entirely relative (unless you are utterly convinced your religion, the one you follow largely because of the geographical accident of where you were born, is the only 'right' religion), your question has no real answer because it has no real meaning.
2006-11-12 10:57:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, God sinned. Let the void make one mistake. Let's see how long it takes for this punishment to end. I like it. Good hypothesis, I AM impressed! The creation and destruction of the universe, how beautiful... how sad...
Since you are merely speculating on your own hypothesis, I can only offer kudos for being so bold....
2006-11-12 10:58:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Christians are waaay too simple minded to answer on your level
2006-11-12 11:03:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What ever you say there is no seperation.
All things though seperated remain in different forms.
2006-11-12 10:55:23 · answer #5 · answered by SKG R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You need to stop smoking pot before you structure your ideas into nonsensical sentences.
2006-11-12 11:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by messenger 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll have to give some deep thought to that deep thought!
2006-11-12 10:55:28 · answer #7 · answered by Red neck 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You really need to get a science lesson.
2006-11-12 10:52:08 · answer #8 · answered by =_= 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋