Dude you have some serious rape issues I have already showed you the meaning of the scripture and it has nothing to do with rape. God granted permission for his people to marry within the people that were taken captives but the woman he married is no longer a captive so she cannot be sold only divorced as is with any wife.
2006-11-11 16:27:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
Good grief. Have you been raped in the past? Are you a Christian, and can't understand why it was allowed to happen? I'm just trying to figure out why you're so fixated on these misinterpretations that most Atheists, even, stay away from when tying to prove their points.
When the Bible talks about rape, it says RAPE. When it talks about kidnapping, it says TAKE. When it talks about most anything, it pretty well comes out and says it.
What you're asking about is not rape, but kidnapping. In OT times of war, God didn't command the men to rape and pilage, he commanded them to take over the area. If the offense was willing to live by God's laws, they were spared. If not, they were killed. May sound harsh, but how else do you keep immorality from infecting your people?
You should really see someone about this fixation you seem to have.
2006-11-11 16:25:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by azar_and_bath 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To echo different Christians who've responded this: no. that is honestly rape and evil in God's sight for a husband to rape his spouse. The submission you communicate of with Eve replaced right into a 2-fold punishment. She replaced into already meant to placed as a lot as Adam as her husband, besides the undeniable fact that the punishment replaced into to continually hate the authority of her husband and be rebellious adverse to Adam because the top of the kinfolk. This has not something to do with sex. Paul in many cases ends a good number of his letters (diverse books of the recent testomony) by commanding husbands and better halves to love one yet another: continually for the spouse to placed as a lot because the husband and for the husband to love and charish the spouse purely as Christ loves the church. Even for husbands to be prepared to sacrifice his existence for his spouse. Rape is by no potential ok. a million Corinthians 7:4 says that the spouse does not have authority over her personal body: her husband does. AND...the husband does not have authority over his personal body: his spouse does. really: you belong to at least one yet another and are to delight one yet another
2016-11-29 01:33:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by bartow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure something from a website called 'evil-bible' is going to present the whole truth,or supply verses such as:
But if in the field the man finds the girl who is engaged, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lies with her shall die.But you shall do nothing to the girl; there is no sin in the girl worthy of death, for just as a man rises against his neighbor and murders him, so is this case. (Deut. 22:25-28)
2006-11-11 16:15:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Serena 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
God did NOT order Moses to tell his people to RAPE women. NONE of the verses you site are about Gods approval of rape. This is the third time at least youve posted this. Move on.
I am a Christian woman, and God would not order me to be raped, but I suppose you have no idea WHERE the Bible says that. Your getting no where with this you know?
2006-11-11 16:06:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by sweetie_baby 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
It is the mere taking that consitutes rape. That is just kidnapping. It is the unwanted sexual penetration that makes it rape. Where exactly does God tell someone to rape someone? I missed that. May God Bless.
2006-11-11 16:07:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If I were forcibly taken by ANY man it would be rape. And times and rules were different back then. Things were allowed that arent allowed today(polygamy..etc) Maybe you should read the ENTIRE bible to find out why these things were allowed...and why they arent allowed today.
2006-11-11 16:08:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by SKITTLES 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
wasn't the movie seven brides for seven brothers also about rape--they didn't forcibly rape them, but they held them hostage until they acquiesced, and by the laws of date rape, that is decidedly rape
2006-11-11 16:11:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
So, what were they supposed to do with the women? Kill them? Let them starve to death seperated from the only community they had ever known?
2006-11-11 16:06:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
as long as the man never touched her. it's still on the stage of "wifenap" not rape.
2006-11-11 16:05:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋