They have been for years but like all judicial organizations they keep missing the mark ,,,,, To kill a snake you have to go for it's head not it's tail ,,,, This is ,, in effect ,, what all drug control agencies should be doing ,,,, There wouldn't be any drug trafficking if there were no drugs to sell ,,,, No one will kill a sake going after the wrong end ,,,,, To kill this snake you have to go to the source of the drugs ,,,, They should be more into stopping its manufacture ,,,,, Not the trafficking ,,,, I mean it's obvious that what they are doing now isn't working and we still have the problem and the whole thing is a drain on the American tax payer ,,,,, This would not only serve to stop drugs but would cut the cost for fighting drug trafficking all together which would be a big relief for the citizens ,,,,, They should also legislate and enact strong laws not only nationally but globally for the crime of dealing in drugs ,,,, Like say ,,,, anyone caught dealing in drugs should have to face capital punishment ,,,, Establish this law and stick to it ,,,, No exceptions ,,,, Drugs mean death anyway so why not place this imposition on the people manufacturing and selling them ,,,, The user won't have any thing to use if they can't get it ,,,,, This law would definitely be a short cut to the head of the snake ,,,, How bad a society wants something stopped cold depends on just how strong a law they place against it ,,,, Of course there are two sides to the coin too ,,,, To some people drugs means job security and too there are allot of crucked politicians and law makers involved in this trade too ,,,,The power of the dollar is infinite so what could be done would have to be done in broad terms ,,,, We could probably cut the cost for the DEA (which is funded bye taxes) in half or more if they initiated new and different ways of handling this problem ,,,, It's more than obvious that what they are doing now isn't working ,,,,, So logic dictates that we need to do something else,,,,,
2006-11-11 16:36:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋