Is 33 too old to have a child?

Question

I never thought about it really til' just now

Answer 1

No, its not too old but over 35 is too old.

Answer 2

No, many women have childen into their early 40s without any problems-- You need to consult your doctor (if it's about you) to see if you are in good health otherwise, and also to discuss family histories, etc. There are some congenital (present at birth) issues that can occur more frequenly of mothers who are in their late 30s or in their 40s. I had my children at 21, 23, 30, and 32, and they've all been healthy and intellectually bright. I wrote more, and then it sounded like a 'Mommy commercial', and I deleted it, but the bottom line is, 33 is a fine age, but there are always potential risks, whether you're 23, 33, or 43. Good luck!

Answer 3

Well I'm 29 and pg. Though the closer you get to 35 the higher your risk for down's and other genetic disorders and birth defects. If your going to be 35 by your due date your considered advanced maternal age and high risk. Every one should have a child when it's what they want and they're ready but just something to think about. I personally wouldn't get pg after 35 because of the risk factor. Now if you asking just because of how old you are and raising a child at that age..... My husband is 42 and this is our second child together. It all depends on weither you want children around you all the time or your looking forward to enjoying yourself after your children have grown.

Answer 4

I hope not, I had my second son at 34. (I'm only 35 now, by the way.) My sister-in-law had her first at 39. I'm much more patient now than I would have been had I had my kids 10 years ago. Of course I had more energy then. But I'm not a blob now. I get out there and play with the best of them. So, I guess it depends on how much energy and tolerance you have at 33.
Someone earlier said that they didn't have a good bond with their parents because their parents were "older." My parents were 33 and 39 when they "got" me (I was adopted at 1 month). My parents were older than most of my friend's parents, but they were very involved in my activities. They both were very active too. They played raquetball, tennis, bowling, and did all that kid stuff too, like miniature golf. I never felt like my friend's parents were doing more than mine.

Answer 5

My mom had me when she was 34, my sis-in-law is 47 and has a 6,7and a half, and 9 yr old.
If your body is able to have one and you are mentally ready for it, it's ok. My parents were 34 and 41 when they had me so when I was growing up, they were the oldest parents in my class and I don't think we had the bond the younger parents had with their kids. In grade school, they weren't physically active in our family activities and I was jealous of the other kids having active parents. Because of the bond issue, I wouldn't want a child after 30 but that is my opinion based on my parent/child relationship. I recommend anyone thinking about children at that age to just think about the bond and how you will get along in the teenager's years. You do what you feel is right. Good luck!

Answer 6

Nope, not at all. Actually, a 33 year old is much more capable of giving a child the lifestyle, attention and nurturing it deserves. However, more health concerns do come into play during that age span, but nothing serious enough to require avoiding pregnancy altogether. It simply means your pregnancy will be given more attention and concern during the gestation.

Answer 7

they consider the age 35 to be a starting point of being to old. Or as they call it advanced maternal age. I wouldn't worry about it to much. I am one of 14 my youngest sister being 7 which made my mom 35 when she had her and everything came out just fine nothing was wrong with the baby. She is smart and very beautiful. Talk to your doctor and see what they have to say about the matter, but if you feel that you are up for the task then I wouldn't worry about it. Go for it and have fun doing it...

Answer 8

Not at all. Many women have their babies in their 30's. Yes there are some increased risks after 35, but as long as you live a healthy lifestyle, you (and your eggs) should be just fine.
With people living better lifestyles, exercising etc. 30 is the new 20! Conceive away!

Answer 9

No but, there are some downfalls in having a child while you are older ( 35+ years old ) The hospital workers say that you have a higher chance of having a baby with birth defects.

Answer 10

No way!
A 63 year-old woman gave birth to a child (oldest)
My mom gave birth to me at 33

Answer 11

Certainly not, but remember, the chances of birth defects and complications rise as you get older. My mom was 43 when she had my little sister almost 8 years ago. She had to go to a high risk pregnancy specialist, but everything turned out great!