I think it can, but it would call for religious society to stop insisting that secular society comply. In other words, religious groups and religious individuals must extend understanding to those of either different religions or no religions.
2006-11-11 03:32:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yngona D 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Every one has a right to their own beliefs. I would never infringe on religious freedom. I want no religion in my laws, however. Like gay marriage, for example. If you are against gay marriage that is just fine. Do not marry a gay person. Otherwise is is no one else's business. No one has the right to "define" marriage and expect the whole country to go along with their stupid nonsensical rules.
2006-11-11 03:35:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There can never be a commonground with religion and secular anything. They are too different thigns. God says to not be of the world or be with the world or be on common ground with the enemy. Secular music and gospel music should never mix. Secular thigns inte h world should never be with anything religious. They should never mix. NEVER!!!!!! Secular anything is with the devil. Materialism, etc...
2006-11-11 03:43:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mia 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
at the start, "super non secular" is a incorrect term. not even an straightforward individual (regardless of in the event that they call themselves non secular) is "non secular" as they consistently persist with what their faith tells them (maximum of them do not also have a sparkling image of what their faith has informed them to do!), and that's punctiliously organic through fact we as human beings can not greater healthful and final in ANY mildew. that is why there are various interpretations of non secular rules jointly as they themselves are crystal sparkling! hence, back on your question, specific that is achieveable. and additionally we can see it in history that the assumption of "Secularism" become first shaped and more advantageous while faith had a significant impact in Western societies. that's the "desires" that make opportunities. EDIT: i did not recommend you made it up your self so as that is incorrect. I completely argued the term "super non secular" (or perhaps "non secular" itself) and its applicability. desire I cleared up the fake effect ;)
2016-11-23 15:38:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No-the battle lines are drawn and either conservative religion or secularism has to give way and modern history shows that it's going to be religion that crumbles first. It's a question of when it disappears not if.
2006-11-11 03:42:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
By accepting that in a modern democratic state of law there is separation between church and state.
2006-11-11 03:35:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Yuri 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What fellowship hath light with darkness ?
Most of the world is evil, for it is written that satan is the God of this world.
It is also written that only a few will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.
In His Holy and Precious Name, Jesus Christ
email DiscipleDave@aol.com
http://members.aol.com/discipledave/book/Index.html
2006-11-11 03:32:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by DiscipleDave 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
If the religious right could learn to compromise, perhaps. But I don't see that happening any time soon.
2006-11-11 03:31:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Girl Wonder 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Unless the religious right gives up it's bigotry, it shouldn't.
Tammi Dee
2006-11-11 03:36:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by tammidee10 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Only in the modification of behaviors that are in conflict.
2006-11-11 03:32:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nora Explora 6
·
0⤊
0⤋