What is best for a child? 50/50? Full Custody with Mother? Full Custody with Father?

Answer 1

That really depends on the child. How old the child is... etc. Bouncing between mother and father is difficult. And if the child is old enough to decided who he/she wants to be with then i believe it should be up to the child. but if not then the mother needs to discuss with the father which would be more appropriate.. if that's not an option - go through a lawyer.

Answer 2

What a tough question. I think 50/50 is too hard on a child. I'm a teacher and I've seen students who live like that and they seem to be confused about one place to call home. If the child is old enough, let him/her decide. Don't take it personally if they don't pick you. The best thing I've ever seen in this situation is: A couple I knew split up, but were still friendly, especially about their children. They purchased houses within walking distance to each other. (both even remarried) This way, even though the children lived with mom, they could go see dad whenever they wanted. The dad also had every other weekend. The parents stayed out of each other's personal lives, but were able to get along very well for their children. So to answer your question, I would say live with one parent and do every other weekend with the other.

Answer 3

Hi,
I have been divorced for 8 years now and I have full custody of my kids' (I have one child over 18 years old now and the other 2 are ages 17 and 13)
Anyway, when I was first divorced, my ex- was granted every-other weekend visitation rights. After the first year...my ex- stopped seeing the kids and I got full custody of all 3 of them.

Answer 4

Well, I am a kid. And my mom and dad are divroced. So I was too little to remember but if I was old enough to be able to decide for myself I would probably pick my mom because moms can pretty much always understand you when u have problems trust me it is better to have full custody with mother.Let the child Pick!

Answer 5

Get a lawyer. If the mother does no longer prefer or is familiar with she can't safeguard the toddler, or for any reason isn't the suited custodian, attempt to barter a custody settlement(via attorneys on the two aspects), and enter right into a written settlement. in case you and the mother can't agree, you're able to ought to coach she is an undeserving mom in a courtroom proceeding. probable an quite nasty thank you to proceed, very high priced, and somewhat an uphill conflict. additionally, the baby is going to love the two his/her mum and dad, and to flow into the international with this type of rancor already latest between his/her mum and dad is obviously damaging. attempt to rach an amicable settlement approximately custody. it is fairly much consistently greater desirable than a courtroom decree. And in case you are able to agree on custody on the outset, there is an impressive risk which you will agree on any destiny differences that must be necessitated via "replace of situations". existence on the two aspects could have its united statesand downs. The "terrific hobbies" of the baby must be the paramount concern of the two mum and dad, and not their subjective desires and desires.

Answer 6

50/50

Answer 7

I have never dealt with this but i have heard that going back and forth between mother and father is hard on a kid. It really depends on what the court decides because they go by financial support and who would be best suited for parenting. Good luck with whatever you are trying to do.

Answer 8

Children were made with 2 parents and i feel that they need BOTH parents love and guidance so i will say 50/50

Answer 9

I think it depends on who was the primary care giver during the marriage. The kids may be happiest with whomever has been taking care of them the whole time. Needless to say, the other parent really should have unconditional visitation time.

Answer 10

I think joint custody is best for the kids. When they know that they will see mom/dad on a regular basis, they will feel more secure.