English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How come Sylvester Stallone isnt being blamed for the current mess we are in?

2006-11-10 22:56:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

I'm not sure what you are trying to really ask but I'll guess. During Russia's illegal invasion and attempted occupation of Afghanistan. The US and Pakistan did send advisors and aid to Afghanistan to assist the Mujaheddin insurgents? Even with the assistance Russia still killed over 2 million Afghan civilians and militia. But in the end Russia got their butts handed to them on a platter and kicked back across their border. Only difference between the movie and the real thing was it was the Afghan militia that kicked Russia's butt not a Hollywood actor with a speak impediment.

2006-11-10 23:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Rambo was only one man who fought the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Sylvester Stallone was the actor who portrayed Rambo in the movies.

2006-11-10 23:05:05 · answer #2 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 0

Well I have started a grass roots movement about this. You to can file a grievance against John Rambo at www.itRambofaultforAfghan.com so sign the petition. Let your voice be heard !!!!

2006-11-11 00:36:15 · answer #3 · answered by JohnRingold 4 · 0 0

Yes he was with those freedom fighters against evil Russians, later they became Taliban and became enemy. Now Rambo is hiding in a sh-hole called Baghdat.

Who the heck writes such a stupid scenario?

2006-11-10 23:29:31 · answer #4 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0 0

omg, lol, I hope don't start taking this rambo thing seriously...we dont know if someone hasn't seen the movies.

2006-11-10 23:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Diadem 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers