as far as i know the senate bill can still have some changes , should asians also be included in a legalization ???
why yes or why not ???( i think they should be included but i am interested in knowing what others think about this ) .
2006-11-10
18:04:01
·
11 answers
·
asked by
game over loves evanescence
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
i also know that the asians along with the latinos are the ones which produce more jobs than anyone .
2006-11-10
18:06:02 ·
update #1
i believe the senate bill would only include the countries which are part of nafta and cafta , if anyone can provide more information i would aprecciate that . i also know that many aisan do actually come illegally and that many do it legally but over stay once thier visas expires , many don't even have permit to be working , they still do it .
2006-11-10
18:34:49 ·
update #2
What is the problem with that? I don't see the point on this question. If this law is created, supposedly will be made to abide the illegal immigration problem, then, if there are illegal Asians, or from any other country, yes, they should.
2006-11-10 18:36:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by cibercitizen 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
even as Ronald Reagan gave amnesty decrease back contained in the overdue ‘80s, it didn’t avert unlawful immigration. Had the previous amnesty bill decreased unlawful immigration to the USA, we wouldn’t have 12-20 million unlawful immigrants residing contained in the united statesA. on the prompt. the previous amnesty bill rewarded, with the objective to speak, unlawful immigrants for breaking our guidelines. This replaced into considered as an incentive by the lots the international over. the effect: unlawful immigration more effective to the USA, and more effective by plenty with the inducement. an similar ingredient will take position if this new outrageous amnesty bill passes: unlawful immigration will develop. And our authorities, being very incompatent, received’t seal off our borders with a wall. they say they’ll upload extra fenses, yet that still received’t cover the completed border. purely flow to Google Earth and zoom onto the border-parts; you’ll see huge quantities unprotected. besides, 40% of all illegals got here to the USA with over-stayed visas or eco-friendly-playing cards; the senate and Jorge Boosh reported they needed to develop the quantity of overseas artwork-visas and eco-friendly-playing cards, which will, in turn, develop unlawful immigration. This amnesty bill is fallacious on such a good number of ranges.
2016-11-29 00:45:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have all sorts of problems with the Senate Bill, but having it apply across the board is not one of them. If it were I would point out that it far favors Mexico, and if anything, that is unfair to other countries. I have nothing against Mexico, but I have a ton against what illegal immigration has done to our schools and services in California.
2006-11-10 22:28:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by DAR 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think every group should be included into the bill, but there should be exceptions for unique cases. A thing to keep in mind. There are people who are depended on the social security system that are both illegal and legal.
2006-11-10 19:18:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Moebius 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't feel any one should be allowed to immigrate to America unless they can offer something that is needed , why should so many be allowed to come here and live on welfare paid by hard working Americans, this is a slap in the face for every American who has to work and pay these taxes, while these good for nothing scum laughs at them , and they certainly do, any politicians who will vote for this kind of immigration should never be reelected, but, there are lots of people who are trained in care giving for example who would be a asset to this country if they were allowed to immigrate , if they were paid $400 per month to take care of the elderly and let them live in their own homes until they died every one would be so much better off , but, at present it cost about $3000 to $4000 per mo for an elderly person to live in a nursing home and the conditions are terrible, strange place , minimum service, sometime mistreated, and the knowledge this is their last stop, look at the savings and the undoubtedly better care and and the rich politicians and others who own thees nursing homes wouldn't be getting rich from others misery, the Philippines have thousands of trained care givers who would be elated to come to America and perform these services and at a fraction of the present cost, no other country allows peopleto come into their country unless they can show they are self supporting , neither should we, our forefathers sure as hell didn't have welfare subsidized housing food stamps when they came here did they?
2006-11-10 18:47:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by jim ex marine offi, 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
As far as I know, the Senate Immigration Bill will include every nationalities. This is not just Latinos Bill. After all this is a comprehensive Immigration Reform.
2006-11-10 18:14:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by luzr1212 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
send them all back where they came from so Americans can get jobs in their own county. The government has told employers that they have to illegals so therefore what happens is that Americans can not get jobs. It is not that the employment rate is bad it that they have taken over the job market. They are teaching our children they are also most are doctors over here I have nothing against them, but this is our county and we should have the jobs. therefore send the foreign doctors, teachers, and so on back to their own county so we can get jobs.
2006-11-10 22:27:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you support amnesty? There's between 12 and 20 million illegal aliens in the United States, people that've violated our immigration laws, plain and simple. Why do you support amnesty?
2006-11-10 19:29:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
i dont care if the immigrants are asian, european, african, mexican, etc. We need to have legal immigration into our country. if a pregnant mexican woman can waddle across the border with her unborn, then a terrorist can do the same.
2006-11-10 19:01:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by trueluvwaitz777 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
You are misinformed... Illegals=Bad. Legals+Good
2006-11-10 18:11:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋