Read the quran, bible or torah. It says men and women were created for different purposes. That man is supposed to lead and the woman to follow. It says they are equal of god but there are never equal and never can be equal.
Men are better in some fields and women are better in other fields. But the leadership of the family is the man.
I am not saying a woman is a slave but in islam, women have a lot of rights. Like they can work but still the husband has to provide for them and they can keep the money for themselves.
But do you think husband should be a leader and a wife should accept it like we all accept our presidents, prime ministers to lead. If we don't like them, we get rid of them. The same way, we also have the right to divorce the man.
But in a marriage should a man be the leader?
God has said this and surely god cannot be wrong
2006-11-10 15:15:15 · 9 answers · asked by Mr Business 3 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
how can god be right or wrong if he dont exist? its only written in a book. anyone couldve written it. and you dont always believe in what you read. to me your talking out your butt! couples work as a unit.no one is better than the other. its one big contradiction. man is equal to god? if he'd existed, do you actually think god would accept the treatment men put apon women?
2006-11-12 14:04:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The man should be the leader IF he is following God's loving guidance... IF he is capable of doing all the things that leadership requires... but, if he's not following God's guidance, then he would be like a blind man leading the woman... they could both fall off of a cliff.
Would you be willing to follow your man if he's blind, even if he lead you off of a cliff... or would you take the lead to keep both of you safe? Do you think your man would want you to let him lead both of you off of a cliff... or do you think he would want you to take the lead & save both of you?
Do you think a loving God would want you to let your man lead you off of a cliff?
God has said that the woman is the man's "help-meet"...it means she is to work together with him, to help him... & there are times when, in certain circumstances, that it's necessary for the woman to take the lead... there are times when a man needs the woman to take the lead.
Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male (not man) nor female (not woman): for ye are all one (all are>>> only human beings), in Christ Jesus.
Acts 10:34 God is no respecter of persons. (God does not respect/value one person more than He respects/values another person... therefore, He does not respect/value a man more than He respects/values a woman).
How do we further know this is true?...because God sent Jesus to die for ALL... not just for man.
I keep up with the bank account... I make sure the bills are paid... I do many things that require leadership... because my husband can't do it all... he either doesn't have the time or he's just too tired & worn out.
If the man can do it all... & do it well, all by himself, then by all means... it's a great thing.
I sincerely hope this helps you gain a better understanding.
2006-11-10 16:42:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think why men have been asked to lead in marriage is because "women are driven by emotions". Where as men Dont give emotions that much importance as women. With due respect to womenkind, i think men are more rationale in their decisions. They work more according to priorities.
Secondly Women are much much more sensitive and sometimes would refrain from taking harsh decisions, which at times is neccessary to take.
Being mere mortals we can only see a few reasons of why Man was chosen to be the head of the family, and if God has said it then he surely cant be wrong.
2006-11-10 15:48:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
All the religious scriptures were initiated by men and men only. Probably their contents wud have been different if women had the oppotunity to draft. Why is it that men only did it? They knew how to manage things. The quality of leader ship is therefore more imbibed in men as established by the religious leaders thrown up in different religions. The sole exception, probably, is Hinduism which worships Godesses as the Gods.
2006-11-10 15:28:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Human Laws are made on selfish reasons. Wise people look to the answers in Nature. Divine law is the Nature's law, that is defined in all five religious Books among the one is Quran.
Look in to the Nature for your answer. You find all living creature have their own families. In every family male is the protector. If you serve your Husband it is not slavery, it is the law of the nature and that law you can't ignore. Human laws have always created disharmony, friction, imbalance and unrest in nature.
Women are not slaves they are the supreme strength of the males. They are the guardians of the Nature.
2006-11-10 16:16:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anarkalli 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a religious person, and can only speak what is in my heart. I am personally a consensually owned slave - YES really...because in my heart, I personally believe that the man is the head of the household, and I have always felt the need to serve, provide pleasure for, and be the "woman of the house". It is important to me that a man feel secure, important, respected, and worthy...and I'm important in making sure he feels that way. We give to each other. He provides and I support....it's the way "people" in my mind were created...as nature does.
2006-11-10 15:41:19 · answer #6 · answered by jacksonholegoddess 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you may desire to enable your ex be conscious of that his cutting-edge undertaking isn't wholesome on your son and you're keen to revisit the area as quickly as he's sober, wholesome, has a house and a few stability. Then, enable him be conscious of that visitation will substitute while he has finished this for six months, no longer in the previous. enable him be conscious of he's welcome to flow to with you (or a depended on man or woman) and the youngster, no longer the rest for now. That way your son can see his father and you have no longer made issues completely inaccessible. placed the duty of substitute onto him.
2016-12-28 18:29:46 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have no problem with the man being the leader....so long as he is a good man, a not an evil hearted one, like mine is.
2006-11-10 17:04:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, now go get me a beer.
2006-11-10 15:28:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋