English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some other scientists who admit that the universe is created by a Creator and who are known by their cited attributes are:

Robert Boyle (the father of modern chemistry)

Michael Faraday (one of the greatest physicists of all times)

Gregory Mendel (the father of genetics; he invalidated Darwinism with his discoveries in the science of genetics)

Louis Pasteur (the greatest name in bacteriology; he declared war on Darwinism)

John Dalton (the father of atomic theory)

Blaise Pascal (one of the most important mathematicians)

John Ray (the most important name in British natural history)

Nicolaus Steno (a famous stratiographer who investigated earth layers)

Carolus Linnaeus (the father of biological classification)

Georges Cuvier (the founder of comparative anatomy)

Matthew Maury (the founder of oceanography)

Thomas Anderson (one the pioneers in the field of organic chemistry)

So who Is this creator? Who is this GrandMaster?

2006-11-10 10:41:58 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Glorious Allah(s.w.t)(GOD) is the one and ONLY creator. He is without son or partner. He is omnipotent.

2006-11-10 10:46:27 · update #1

Ok CC i' call Jesus name for you

Isa. Prophet IIIIIIIssssaaaaa. Ah! Done it. I love him btw.

2006-11-10 10:56:32 · update #2

21 answers

Jesus, my dear... Do we have to go over this again...??
Say it with me Jee-suuusss. One more time Jeee-suuss. Good, now your getting it, now... say it by yourself..... Good... you got it now! Jesus :)
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. John 1:10
Jesus is the maker

2006-11-10 10:49:29 · answer #1 · answered by CC 2 · 1 1

Gregor Mendel did not disprove Darwinism. Quite the opposite. His work helped prove the accuracy of Darwin's theories of evolution by showing how natural selection works at the genetic level.

And just because some of these accomplished scientists may have believed in God doesn't prove the existence of God. It merely shows that scientists are not necessarily less likely to believe in God (or at least to admit to not believing) than non-scientists.

2006-11-10 18:51:21 · answer #2 · answered by Rob B 4 · 1 0

most of those scientists were from a time when if you voiced any doubts in the existence of god you would become an outcast. and you got some of your facts wrong, Mendel's work on inheritance helped to clarify the process of evolution, it is a fundamental part of evolutionary theory. i don't know where you got the idea that it invalidated it. now blase pascal, i don't know if your basing this on the 'pascal wager' on the existence of god, but it would be a pretty disreputable reason to believe in god, but from that wager you could make a firm bet that pascal was a pragmatic atheist. i don't know about the rest, but if you made two basic mistakes like that the rest of your evidence is doubtful.

2006-11-10 19:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The religions cannot prove that there is a man living in a cloud (while they collect $3 billion a year in donations). Don't go by what people say (not valid proof). If I owed you a million dollars and I had someone say that I deposited the money into your bank account you would say thet you want proof (I know that you would). After so many thousands of years why can't your religion prove that there is a man living in a cloud? That's the problem. Start submitting proof and just think of all the converts. Come on, get to work.

2006-11-10 18:55:31 · answer #4 · answered by The professor 4 · 0 0

And what of the Greek philosopher who proved the existence of a "higher power" before the dawn of either Christianity or Islam?

2006-11-10 18:51:41 · answer #5 · answered by kristalshyt 3 · 0 0

Ummmmm Cheers!

2006-11-10 18:51:00 · answer #6 · answered by a_chickaboom02 2 · 0 1

Just because someone says God exists, doesn't mean he does. By your same rational, I can say "Donald Duck is God" and that would make it so.
I do believe in God, but religion is faith and just because someone or a book says so, doesn't make it so.

2006-11-10 20:39:50 · answer #7 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 0 0

ooh! scientist from the dark ages who would have been killed if they challenged the church--not to mention none of the scientifically proved god's existence or the creationist theory--you are an idiot

2006-11-10 19:04:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ok, so you have a list of names, where is the proof? Names are not proof

Give specifics, quotes, urls, something

2006-11-10 18:49:59 · answer #9 · answered by Black Dragon 5 · 1 0

I believe in a higher power, not the god of the people.

2006-11-11 01:04:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers