2006-11-10 10:07:14 · 17 answers · asked by HOMER 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Yes, he's a traitor.
2006-11-10 10:13:58 · answer #1 · answered by bekkiboo31 4 · 2⤊ 7⤋
This problem existed long before Bush. This was a problem 20 years ago. It was solved by simply making illegals legal. The people that should be impeached are those in the House and the Senate that aid and abet the illegal cause. Nancy Pelosi is a representative of a sanctuary city. A city that has openly defied U.S. Law and has instructed it's employees NOT to Cooperate with Federal authorities.. As a member of Congress she took a oath to uphold the Constitution and the laws of the land. Agree or disagree she is honor bound to uphold the law. She does not get to choose. She has refused to honor that contract and SHOULD be impeached. I don't mean to pick only on her. Her buddies Feinstein and Boxer need to go too.
Bill taught Monica a new skill. I find that far less reprehensible and damaging than the likes of Pelosi yet we make a BIG deal over the Bill thing and no one mentions the Pelosi thing. Which costs more? 20 million illegal aliens on the public dole or Monica's dry cleaning bill. OK maybe I understated the Bill thing but did we really need all those hearings? was that really important?
Impeach those that support illegal aliens against the will of the people and elect those that don't.
2006-11-10 19:06:49 · answer #2 · answered by Bob G 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why? Do you ask this because of who is sitting in more of the seats now? President Bush didn't do anything wrong. The Mexican Government treats their people like dirt, so they come over here to find a better life. President Bush simply wants them to come over "legally." It would be nice if they also learned english, and didn't take jobs for 5.00 an hour because they are illegalls. If they got the right papers, they could be paid 10.00 an hour. All this hog wash about impeaching President Bush, and most of the people who say it don't know what the - - - - they are talking about! And the idiots who say he's a "traitor" well, they can kiss it!
2006-11-10 18:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by Republican!!! 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nope. It's a big problem, not all his fault by any means, and they've been trying to win the war or whatever...doesn't change the fact that something needs to change in the way we deal with illegal immigration, ESpecially where Mexico is concerned, as they're by far the worst offender on our immigration laws, but not the only country by any means, either. Bottom line, immigration reform's overdue, and no, that does NOT mean blanket amnesty, it means new enforcement and compliance measures that are ratified, passed, and implemented.
www.reportillegals.com
www.ice.gov
Support the US Border Patrol! They're hiring, if anyone's qualified/interested...
2006-11-10 18:22:35 · answer #4 · answered by gokart121 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush WILL Be Impeached
It Will Have NOTHING To Do With ILLEGAL Immigration
Destroying The Bush Crime Family
(Impeachment Proceedings)
Is The 2nd Item On The Democratic Agenda
The First Is To Demand Troop Withdrawal From Iraq
Thats Why Rummy " Resigned "
2006-11-10 18:25:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
No. But political liberals will look for any excuse, no matter how far fetched, to argue that Bush should be impeached. I personally think Clinton should have resigned or been impeached for the Monica Lewinsky scandal. A political view isn't a reason to impeach any politician. I would argue that a character flaw, such as marital infidelity, might be a valid reason.
2006-11-10 18:19:14 · answer #6 · answered by lmnop 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Sure. Why not. Failure to enforce the laws he swore to uphold, and undermining the Constitution.
That was a joke. He'll be gone in 2 years and it will cost tons in many ways to impeach him. We just rendered him pretty much impotent on all other fronts, and Cheney would do no differently than he on immigration.
2006-11-10 18:24:59 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush should not be impeached he didn't lye, he repeated Intel that he believed was accurate. As far as immigration goes why would he be impeached for illegals breaking our laws?
2006-11-10 18:13:50 · answer #8 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He should be impeached for MANY reasons. Lying about WMD in Iraq (he should have known beyond a shadow of a doubt before entering into war), the war there, failing to enforce the illegal immigration law, failing to uphold the Constitution of the USA which he swore to under his presidential oath of office, endorsing the Transcontinental Highway, NAFTA, CAFTA, and more.
2006-11-10 18:22:35 · answer #9 · answered by rebelflag4usa 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You can't be impeached unless you have broken a law and he didn't come here illegally.
But really, people are trying to work out the situation...unfortunately their recent solution was bad.
2006-11-10 18:12:38 · answer #10 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
No. Actually on this issue he's more with the Democrats than the Republicans.
2006-11-10 21:22:42 · answer #11 · answered by Ruthinia 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋