"im not a slave to a god that doesnt exist. im not a slave to a world that doesnt give a ****"
2006-11-10 04:22:26 · 8 answers · asked by Amanda 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
-marilyn manson
2006-11-10 04:58:57 · update #1
I think it's a workable quote.
I'd suggest dropping the vulgarity, not because I'm a prude, but because it distracts from the quote when the vulgarity is edited out. If you only post it where it's not censored, then that's okay.
I suggest replacing it with one verb. That way it flows better as the two statements are congruous. For example:
"I'm not a slave to a god that doesn't exist.
I'm not a slave to a world that doesn't care."
Actually, I'd rather see "care" replaced with a two-syllable word. It would flow much better. I see some okay words like "comfort" and "nurture," but those don't thrill me.
Try this different approach:
"I'm not a slave to a god that isn't.
I don't care for a world that doesn't."
Kind of twisty with the words. It might be seen as too pretentious, though.
2006-11-10 04:24:24 · answer #1 · answered by Rev Kev 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
do agree to a certain extent. however this depends upon one person interprets the quote as compared to other who may interpret it differently
2006-11-10 12:27:22 · answer #2 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree to the first part. I don't know what's behind the asterisks in the second part.
2006-11-10 12:26:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont think anything of it for it is not Godly. I do pray for the person who quoted it.
2006-11-10 12:28:31 · answer #4 · answered by yeppers 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Neither profound nor meaningful.
2006-11-10 12:26:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
An atheist that is wrapped a little too tight.
2006-11-10 12:34:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
has no meaning to me..to each their own...
2006-11-10 12:30:10 · answer #7 · answered by phyllis_neel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Crap.
2006-11-10 12:24:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋