No, but it does explain why we are invisible.
2006-11-10 01:47:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right . but many christians would not like it as they have blind faith and not any faith based on reason or logic.These religions without exception were made by men who were not well aware of the forces of nature or any logical thinking . In fact they , barring a very rarwe few , di d not have as much intelligence as a high school boy of these days . It is but natural and ther eis nothing bad in accepting the fact and admitting the truth.They di\d not know that threis nothing as sky and it is not a vault over the earth .In the first book of Mosses , genesis , moses has said about the creation of the world by God .In the olden days itseems that every body thought that god created the world in a jiffy by magic . the had no idea that the the Almighty needed several thousands of years to make a blade of grass .
Mose has said that ,god said that let there be a world and the world appeared . he said that let thre be a vault and a valut appeared Because moses thought that the blue saky is a vault over the earth , he attributed his knowledge to god and made look like an ignoramus . this one instant is sufficient to let the people understnd that that it is not God who did all this, but theae men who knew not much who said that goid did this and that , according to thier knowledge .
They say that god is form;less and they condem idolatory. but hey say that god made man after his image and thus they have attributed to god the image of man .o it goes without say ing that god had everything that man had . God has made a woman or the man made afteer his image and so god should have also a woman and should necessarily have every part that every man has . and every part of the anotaomy has its own use and a body that has organs would necessarily do their function.Thse things did not occur to the men /man who made the religions as the level of his intelligence was only that much and he is not tobe blamed for that as itwas that that existed at tha thime . may be his level was the greatest at that particular time. So imagine the level of the inteeeligence of others at that time .If god id not have his exual organ as man has , god would be an Unac and even man would not respect an unac . And so God would not have preferred to be an unec. You know that he has had a son in Jesus . and god id a father and a fathere should necessarily have everything that every othere father has .Such discussions might be disgusting to the blind believers .But they fail to understand what the people of othere faith would feel when they criticize them from street ccorners as evangelists .
All religions created by men have all the defects and meritsaccording to the level of intelligence and knowledge and culture of the persons who created them.There is nothing to make much of it. the only defect is that even well ediucated people with scientific and logical thinking still continue to place much blind aith in matters like this purely on the ground of belonging to some religion or other.
All religioins which call God as HE fail to understand that HE will have has everything .that any he has .
The hindus only accept that God has everything and can be seen in everything and that God is HE , SHE and IT also.
Their thinking seems to be very logical as according to them God is in all things animate and inanimate and that the universe and all lives emerge after thousands of eons , are maintained for thousands of eons and are annihilated and made dormant for thousands opf eons ebefore they re-emerge . they do not attribute the unsceientific character of a magician who created the world in a jiffy. According to them God is a being of non -being , that is sustainig the entire universe and so they attribute any character and any for that is pleasing to any particular individual. That is the reason for the plurality of God in the hindu pantheon.This philosophy has grown over a period of several thousands of years and is not attributable to any particular individualand is also not a religion of the kind that we have .So there is not much of unintelligent and unscientific and illogical thoughts in that ancient religion.OIn fact the greatest scientist of the modern days , Albert Einstien himself has said abot the hindu veda "Bhagavad Gita in the following words- 'when I have read Bhagavad Gita and reflected on the creation of the universe ,everything else seems to be superfluous." So we have an ancient religion with the great scientific wisdom far ahead of its time too.
2006-11-10 00:53:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by diamond r 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Man was created spiritually, not physically in God's image
2006-11-10 00:10:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It is spiritually speaking. Spiritual - not physical!!! You need spiritual eyes to see the things of God - not earthly or fleshly things. Sometimes to interpret the Bible you need to be saved by the cleansing that only Jesus Christ can do - within yourself. I pray you find the Truth - Jesus Christ.
2006-11-10 00:10:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by jworks79604 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You might want to spend a few more years thinking before you broach this subject again. The adults here are laughing at you.
2006-11-10 00:35:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by dave 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful:
Praise be to Allah, the One who modeled the mode [kayyafa’l kaif], though He is completely free from modality [kaifiyya];
And has localized locality [ayyana ‘l-ain], though He utterly transcends location [ainiyya];
And exists [wujida] in every place, though He is far removed from circumstantiality [zarfiyya];
And makes Himself present with [hadara ‘inda] every thing, though He is far exalted above “withness” [‘indiyya].
He is the First of everything, and there is no posteriority [akhiriyya] applicable to Him.
If you say “where [aina]? ”, you are imposing location [ainiyya] on Him.
If you say: “how [kaifa]?”, you seek Him through modality [kaifiyya].
If you say: “when [mataa]? ”, you are besetting Him with temporality [waqtiyya].
If you say “He is not [laisa],” you are excluding Him from being [kawniyya].
If you say “if [law]”, you are confronting Him with deficiency [naqsiyya].
If you say “why [lima]?”, you are disputing with Him over sovereignty [malakutiyya].
Glory be to Him and Exalted is He!
He is not preceded by precedence [qabliyya]. He is not superseded by subsequence [ba’diyya]. He cannot be compared by likeness [mithliyya]. He cannot be matched by comparability [shakliyya]. He is not flawed by matrimonial conjugality [zawjiyya]. He is not known by corporeality [jismiyya].
Glory be to Him and Exalted is He!
If He were a tangible object [shakhs], He would be known in terms of quantity [kammiyya].
If He were a physical body (jism), He would consist of elements combined in structure [binya], but He is Singular [Wahid], in refutation of structurality [banawiyya].
He is Eternal [Samad], in refutation of idolatry [wathaniyya].
There is nothing similar to Him, in rejection of [the anthropomorphism] of the Hashwiyya.
There is nothing comparable to Him, in refutation of those who maintain the heresy of characterization [wasfiyya].
No mover moves, in good or evil, in private or in public, on land or at sea, except by His Will, in refutation of the Qadariyya.
His Power [Qudra] admits no comparison, and His Wisdom [Hikma] has no final limit, in denial of the Hudhaliyya.
His rights are those that are obligatory [huququ-hu ‘l wajiba], and His proof is that which is effective [hujjatu-hu ‘l baligha]. No one is entitled to claim any right over Him, contrary to the precept of the Nazzamiyya.
He is Just [‘Adil] and does no injustice in His judgments. He is Truthful [Sadiq] and does no injustice in His judgments. He is Truthful [Sadiq] and does not go back on what He makes known.
He is a speaker [Mutakallim] who utters a speech that is infinitely pre-existent, sempiternal [kalam qadim azali], not as one who creates his speech.
He has sent down the Qur’an and He has made it impossible for the eloquent linguists to rearrange it, thereby disproving the arguments of the Muradiyya.
Our Lord condones faults and forgives sins, for those who repent. Even if a man returns to his sin, that which is past will absolutely not return to the human being.
Our Lord is completely free from falsity [zaif] and far removed from tyranny [haif].
We also believe that He has reconciled the hearts of the believers and that He has caused the unbelievers to go astray, in refutation of the Hishamiyya.
We also believe that the sinners [fussaq] of this Community [Umma] are better than the Jews, the Christians and the Magians, in refutation of the Ja’fariyya.
We affirm that He sees Himself, and sees what is other than Himself and that He is One who hears [Sami’] every call, One who sees [Basir] every secrecy, in refutation of the Ka’biyya.
He has created His creatures in a most excellent natural constitution [fitra], and, after He has returned them through extinction in the darkness of the grave, He will restore them to the condition He first produced them, in refutation of the Dahriyya.
Then, when He has gathered them for the Day of His Reckoning, He will manifest Himself to His dear friends, so they will witness Him directly with the faculty of sight. He will be visible like the moon, and He will be veiled from none but those who deny the vision [of Him], such as the Mu’tazila. How could He be veiled from His dear friends, or make them stop before His screen, when His sempiternal, infinitely pre-existent promises have already been set forth?
2006-11-10 00:48:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by shaawanat 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Androgyny my friend -- Androgyny.
The angels are known for it.
2006-11-10 00:11:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by lilly 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
god did not create any thing because god is imaginary. This link proof it all; http://www.godisimaginary.com/index.htm
2006-11-10 00:11:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
spiritual image, not physical.
2006-11-10 00:10:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
shut up, that is not funny
2006-11-10 00:18:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by NONAME 5
·
1⤊
1⤋