Arguably Yes...look at the last round of the Greg Norman's epic collapse at the 1996 Masters and Nick Faldo shooting a cool 67 to win by 5 strokes. 3 Masters victories and 3 Open Championships = 6 Majors, which is a great golf career!
Not winning a U.S. Open could be fodder for the nay sayers, but Nick played more Internationally than most European players these days.
2006-11-10 00:23:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Madman1212 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Winning six Majors certainly supports his candidature as an all time great. He also contended, and probably should have won, the USPGA and Open during his best years in the early nineties. He was the first player to ever win one million pounds in a season and still holds the Ryder Cup points record. He didn't even take up the sport until his teens and his last tournament victory occurred before his 40th birthday, so he achieved all of this is in a very short time in golfing terms. His Masters victory over Norman in 1996 was arguably the most thrilling comeback ever seen in the sport, but it also marked the end of his period of dominance. My guess is that if golfing equipment hadn't reduced the importance placed on shot-making then Faldo would have continued to win a number of tournaments post 1997. Certainly his divorces and the fact that he really became a part-time player over the last few years minimsed the impact that he could make as well, but he was still able to compete on courses where length off the tee was less of a factor in determining who won. He nearly won a fourth Open as recently as 2003, but I doubt he will ever contend again as he approaches 50 and commentates on tournaments more often than he plays in them.
2006-11-10 03:43:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've got been a brilliant Faldo fan each of ways - extremely while he used to get slammed interior the press - nicknamed El Foldo while he failed. The media could be extremely vicious at situations - and confusing nut that he's - Faldo replaced into difficult in the direction of them in return - including to his acceptance of being a bitter-puss and having a 'air of secret via-bypass'. He replaced into castigated for no longer being extra supportive in the direction of a fellow Ryder Cup considerable different yet that replaced into the way he remained one hundred ten% focussed on his activity - and not enable something distract his concentration. Ryder Cup is as demanding because it gets - and Faldo's journey would be an asset. it is often argued our successes have been extra often than not by way of a extra effective team spirit - the chuminess and cheerfulness of the european excursion as against the lots extra individualistic and indifferent ethos which pervades the U. S. excursion. Montie is media friendly, has an excellent RC checklist yet all of us be attentive to he could be surely distracted while no longer enjoying properly - extremely while heckled via a adversarial US crowd. On paper the U. S. would be favourites and use all of the final concepts video games - wherein Faldo is properly practised. That lots older, wiser and now no longer enjoying on the top echelons, Faldo has softened extremely lots and with 6 Majors to his credit he will command the utmost appreciate from the gang. So I reckon he will do a robust job - as he will ought to - and communicate approximately his Captain's function and getting the ultimate result. think of effective !!! Lol.
2016-12-14 04:47:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, Nick's fine. He's in an elite class. He had to deal with the UK's tabloid press for years (don't those rats ever let up?) calling him "Foldo" and the like. I'm very glad to see running the European side in 2008. He'll give an already exciting contest more excitement. (As will Paul Azinger)
So, in short, Nick Faldo has had a great career.
2006-11-10 23:51:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don ´t think so. An «all time great» has to equal Tom Morris jn. Vardon, Hagen,Jones, Snead, Hogan, Nicklaus, Woods. He is there with J.H. Taylor, James Braid, Henry Cotton, Bobby Locke, Peter Thomson, Arnold Palmer, Gary Player,Tom Watson, Lee Trevino, who with the exception of Palmer need the first name; well nearly!
2006-11-10 10:32:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Peter J 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think he would be considerd as the all time player! But then again you have to think of older players as the equiptment wasn't as easy to play with then! It was much harder to shoot those scores then! I think he would still be considerd for this side of the Atlantic! But as i said you have to consider those older players like Sam Snead they have to use the old wooden clubs so it would have been much harder to do so. Owell thats my opinion!
He's still a great player though!!
(Happy Golfing people!!)
2006-11-10 02:53:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Loz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it does we have not produced anyone like him since and we probably never will. Colin Mongomerie is a close second but that is all he ever will be second to Faldo. we have a living legend and we should appreciate what we have for as long as we have it. What ever it may be!!
2006-11-13 07:18:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely.
His great performance in the 96 Masters was overshadowed by Norman's collapse. He rebuilt his swing under the guidance of Ledbetter before it was popular.
2006-11-10 03:30:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely agree. His biography is well worth the read. He had the reputation of being a bit of an iceman while playing, and this didn't make him so popular with the crowds. But still one of the greats.
2006-11-10 00:01:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by 13caesars 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree i have his autograph i served him at wentworth PGA glof championship great man.
2006-11-10 00:02:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by jules 4
·
0⤊
0⤋