English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-09 22:18:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

13 answers

The food, the Restaurants, sightseeing etc.

2006-11-09 22:21:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because ths US can't keep their nose out of other countries business. We will go in their, lose many soilders, spent big bucs and then turn around and spend big bucs to fix everything for them. Where is the logic in that? We do it every time. BUT as an American citizen, if we didn't fight for our rights,(the military) we could be hearing all the bombs droppping on us, the Miltary is fighting for our rights and freedom, so you and I can sleep better at night, they are protecting our country FOR US. As far oil, what happened to our great Alaskan Pipe LIne???? We have alot of things they need also, so it's like the saying goes, one hand feeds the other.

2006-11-09 22:34:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

To assist the Iraqi government by providing security forces and training the Iraqi military.

2006-11-09 22:35:26 · answer #3 · answered by Mike J 5 · 3 0

Because the area has a huge amount of oil. We wouldn't care so much if it was just people killing each other. The problem is that conflict in that area of the world is bad for the wallets of Americans. Our country has turned a blind eye to the plight of Sudan and other African countries. Might I point out that oil is much more valuable to us than say...............human life.

2006-11-09 22:29:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

At this very moment? Probably dodging mortars, VBIEDs, IED's, rocket attacks and small arms fire. trying to stave off the civil war that will surely ensue as soon as we pull out.

2006-11-10 01:28:13 · answer #5 · answered by p_lo25 3 · 1 0

Shopping.

2006-11-09 22:21:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Too scare of what might happen if we leave. Like we were scared into going in there by al queda and some people at DC.

2006-11-09 22:21:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

because bush f###ed up. now he's trying to save face. ain't gona happen. russia spent over 13 years in the same area and lost. got beat with stick and stones, go figure.

2006-11-09 22:53:13 · answer #8 · answered by DASH 5 · 0 2

to confound idiot liberals by preserving the freedom for them to openly ridicule and to comment in the style of john kerry.

2006-11-09 22:20:47 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3 1

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons
of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb
18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens.
Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs.
Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may
be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to
President Bus h, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the
peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We
also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant
UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical
warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D,
NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein
has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and
storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons
of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat
because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating
America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2006-11-10 00:00:07 · answer #10 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers