English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

okay this kid says he put a personal protection order against me but i was never notified of it, so i called the police station and they said you have to be served papers in order for the personal protection order to take place, well tonight i was at my friends house and this kid showed up and said he was going to call the police if i didnt leave and i told him that if i was there first he had to leave and he said thats not what the police told him, and i told him go ahead and call the police because i was never served any papers so with that, since i was there first did i have to leave if the personal protection order was real or he had to leave?

2006-11-09 16:34:16 · 6 answers · asked by Babigirl 1 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

6 answers

If there was a TPO or CPO against you, there would be no doubts about it whatsoever, you would have been served and the officer delivering the protection order would explain that the items checked apply to you and the ones that are not checked do not apply to you

2006-11-09 16:40:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The police were right. You do have to be served before it is in effect. If there was such a paper served then yes you would have to leave because if you didn't you would be breaking the order. Sounds unfair but when is the law ever fair to those of us that don't break it?

2006-11-09 16:46:47 · answer #2 · answered by rebjerjam 2 · 0 0

once you're a minor you're below the secure practices of your mum and dad. you're able to do no longer something approximately this as we talk. Your mom is appearing on what she believes to be the ultimate activity of her daughter. I have not have been given any theory as why you sense you're a extra effective choose of people than she is yet from my journey I surely have yet to make certain a minor that has the skill to make extra effective judgements than an person parent.

2016-12-14 04:42:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They should have been told when they got the order that if they saw you, they should not approach you, but turn around and go the other way.

2006-11-09 16:35:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you weren't served with any papers then you don't have to do anything but live your life like you normally would...

2006-11-09 16:37:40 · answer #5 · answered by ClassyGemini 3 · 0 0

ONE -YOU DID NOT HAVE TO LEAVE--HE WAS IN VIOLATION..

TWO YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE NOTIFIED-MAIL OR ATTY OR JUDGE IS SUFF OF REST ORDER ECT..
JUST THE FACT YOU KNEW IS SUFF.

BUT IN THIS CASE---HE SQUASHED THIS ORDER WHEN HE SHOWED UP AND REMAINED ON THE PREMISES.

ACTUALLY IT CONSTITUTED A THREAT TO YOU-
AND HE VIOLATED THE ORDER HIMSELF-
AND COULD BE HELD IN COMTEMPT...

I SURE WOULD NOTIFY DA-ATTY OF THIS EVENT AND REQUEST RULING,

2006-11-09 16:40:52 · answer #6 · answered by cork 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers