English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

Yes, resoundingly YES! Not that I think it should be like a "witch hunt," but when they pull people over for any kind of traffic infractions, I think they should ALWAYS ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency, legal drivers' license, and proper insurance. If, in the course of their duties, they find illegal immigrants, they should hold them and call INS for deportation. This should be STANDARD procedure for ALL police in the USA.

2006-11-09 18:58:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Deleted Answer:

Should The Local Police
Be Allowed To Enforce (Immigration) Laws?

Good Question ....

Should The Local Police Be Allowed To Enforce (ANY) Laws?

Ignore SOME Laws And Enforce Others ?

Who Decides Which Laws To Enforce ?

We Cannot SELECTIVELY Enforce Our Laws

We Are A Nation Of Laws

Without Law Enforcement
We Are No Better Than Mexico, Iraq, Or Afghanistan





In Response To Carol R And Pamela V (Above)
((Below) Before This Answer Was DELETED)

Whats To KNOW ??

Gotta Greencard ??

Are You A Citizen ??

NO To Either Question
You Get Processed For Immediate Deportation

Its Not Racism
Its Not Rocket Science
Its LAW ENFORCEMENT

Reason of Violation:Chatting & Personal Communications

2006-11-10 23:53:41 · answer #2 · answered by JD 2 · 1 0

I believe so. If we're going to have immigration laws, then they need to be enforced. Either enforce the law, or abolish it. Laws with no enforcement carry no weight, and will not be respected. Hence the multi-billion dollar illegal immigration 'industry'. Human trafficking, drug trafficking, god knows what else goes on, it has as its' common denominator 'immigration'...it needs to be handled a lot better, and I think the Democrats will do a good job of addressing it. If they don't, for some reason, there's always recall elections...

2006-11-09 18:13:14 · answer #3 · answered by gokart121 6 · 1 1

Yes - as an immediate and short term measure, though.

That is, police, trained in immigration laws presumably, should have the power to detain and apprehend those breaking them - but they shouldn't be required to continue the custodial process but hold the offender until they can be handed to immigration authorities.

Front line law enforcement are often better placed to detect and apprehend such people in their own communities - but the entire process of detainment, charging, deportation, etc, should be handled by immigration as to not increase police workload.

I believe all police & law agencies should work together - if a crime is committed, it's committed - and it shouldn't be just one agencies job to apprehend the offenders.

That said though, once the offender is caught - different areas are appropriate to deal with different facets of law.

2006-11-09 15:37:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

i haven't examine the completed bill--yet there are regulations on that. It should be blatant lack of understanding of the regulation and does not go everywhere if it grew to become into only backlash. I truthfully have a very good concept--if the FEDS did their job, we in Arizona does not ought to pass a regulation to enforce latest regulations to guard ourselves. The police already manage this daily. regrettably--you should examine AZ information to comprehend that they manage it daily. have faith it or not, this is corporation as well-known, yet with the blessing of the state and a assertion to the feds that they can't stress states to bear the financial and protection brunt of their brazen and open unwillingness to enforce their own regulations. If all people exterior of AZ has an argument, please deliver donations and cops on a regularly occurring foundation. in case you proportion in the issue, perhaps you have a say.

2016-10-21 14:01:29 · answer #5 · answered by equils 4 · 0 0

If Local police enforce federal drug laws than they should enforce federal immigration laws too

2006-11-09 17:14:49 · answer #6 · answered by spyderman131 3 · 3 1

Yes, police should be allowed to enforce EVERY law. They are too tied up with everything else, however, so the government developed the I.N.S. to enforce them instead.

2006-11-09 15:41:26 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 4 1

Most local police don't even KNOW immigration laws. How could they possibly enforce them?

2006-11-09 15:36:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I think that in the course of their duties, they discover a person being an illegal alien, that person should be detained and turned over to immigration. I don't think that "local" police should go out and make it an illegal alien hunt, but in the course of their duties, turn over any illegal alien to the proper authorities. I know there has been a very big debate along border towns, and I do agree that any level of officer(local, county, tribal, state and of course gov't), should turn over illegal aliens.

2006-11-09 15:34:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

We need to empower them This Initiative was designed by my spouse and myself and you may feel free to use it.


We must insist that our leaders, both locally and nationally, address the issue of the security of our nation.

Might I suggest that on a local (town) or county or state level one might submit an initiative for the people to vote on. It requires a number of signatures to be placed on a ballot. Special elections for such are acceptable. This is a personal creation and you are free to use the dialogue. Of course, change the wording to be applicable to your situation.

My thanks.

Every state should pass laws preserving the American sovereignty, and giving state law enforcement officials the power to enforce federal laws. This to mean arresting, containing and deporting illegals.

For example:

An Initiative By the Citizens of the State of ------

Whereas the security of the citizens of the State of ------ is the responsibility of the law enforcement agencies of the State;

Whereas the law enforcement agencies of the State are not enabled to enforce certain laws of the United States;

Whereas the citizens of the State of ------- will benefit if State and local law enforcement agencies are authorized to enforce certain laws of the United States;

It is in the best interests of the citizens of the State of ------ to authorize the law enforcement agencies of the State of ------ to enforce certain laws of the United States.

The local and State law enforcement agencies of the State of ------ are hereby authorized to enforce criminal laws of the United States, except in such areas that the United States has expressly reserved enforcement of such laws to the United States and its agencies.

The prosecutors of the local and State entities are authorized to prosecute persons accused of violation of the laws of the United States, which have been apprehended by State or local law enforcement agencies.

The courts of the State of ------ are authorized to adjudicate cases brought by prosecutors of the local and State entities subject to the jurisdictional requirements of Section *.

State and local agencies are authorized to seek reimbursement from the United States for enforcement efforts.

2006-11-09 15:40:04 · answer #10 · answered by Patriot 1 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers