English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hi, I'm looking to make a MAJOR upgrade from my Sony CyberShot DSC-P32 camera to a higher-quality, more professional camera. As of right now, I'm torn between the two models mentioned. I would like some opinions on which you would choose and why. I understand that statistically the FZ7 is probably a (much) better camera, but the above normal noise levels are leaving me a little relunctant to go with that model (even though it can even be purchased a few dollars cheaper than the S2). I'm looking for a camera that can offer me vivid and natural color, with low noise, and good (possibly sharp) contrast.

So, does the FZ7's better specs and benefits largely outweigh the S2-IS's lack of noise? Which camera would you choose and why?

Thanks very much ahead of time for any answers. The best will be rewarded.

2006-11-09 11:03:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics Cameras

3 answers

Most reviewers rate the S2 higher, based on lower noise, faster auto-focus and superior video clips. My daughter has an S2 and is very happy with it.

All of these cameras have some noise, especially at ISO 200 and above, and in low light. (Panasonic is still worse at noise.) However, most of it cannot be seen in prints.

You might check prices some more. Around here, the S2 is under $300 and the FZ7 is over $300.

When I made the choice earlier this year, I picked the Sony H1. It has the same overall performance as the S2 and FZ7, but has a 2.5 inch LCD. And I liked the weight and shape better. I am very happy with the H1.

I paid $350 for the H1 (now about $325); today I would look for a sale on the Sony H5 for about $400. (Circuit City has them for $450 this week, but includes a 1 GB Memory Stick.)

Good Luck!

2006-11-10 02:04:39 · answer #1 · answered by fredshelp 5 · 0 0

You can go here and read in depth reviews, look at sample images and read user opinions on each camera. I see what you mean about the specs being almost identical. The ability to use regular "AA" batteries might weigh in as an advantage for the S2 IS. My daughter has had an S2 IS for about 4 months and loves it. I would be impressed by the Leica Lens on the FZ7, but I have to say that I am very disappointed by the camera's inability to make good use of it. The noise in tests is unacceptably hig to me.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_s2is%2Cpanasonic_dmcfz7&show=all

2006-11-09 11:20:27 · answer #2 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 0 0

S2 is outdated now, it's been replaced by the new S3 IS - a great camera. Check also Canon PS Pro1, Olympus SP-510 and Fujifilm S6500 - all of these are great cameras, but i think S3 IS beats them all - it is fun, fast, has effective image stabilization and can record high resolution video with stereo sound up to memory card space limit.

2006-11-14 11:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by Nick_d_N 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers