2006-11-09 06:50:31 · 26 answers · asked by psycho 3 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
Considering Jackie Chan only learned movie martial arts, he is not a martial artist first, he would be quickly removed. Then lets see, Jet Li in his younger days could move so fast that conventional cameras could not capture movement. and Bruce Lee was the master of the one inch punch. so It'd be hard tio say between the two, but I like Jet better so jet
2006-11-09 07:20:45 · answer #1 · answered by cisco_cantu 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Bruce>Jet>Jackie
2006-11-09 17:41:12 · answer #2 · answered by hoksungy 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
BRUCE would win it in less than 3 min. not sure who said Jackie couldnt because he was a movie martial artist first but thats wrong as well Jackie studied Northern Kung fu just as long as he has been doing movies and Opera. and Jet li is good but I dont remember the studios having to put a wire on Bruce to ad some cool effect because the MAN was BADDDDD
2006-11-11 20:40:21 · answer #3 · answered by John H 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jackie Chan and Jet Li have admitted that Bruce Lee is better and it's not hard to see why.
2006-11-10 16:28:23 · answer #4 · answered by HHH 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is the most rediculous question, and it is asked all the time on here. Jackie Chan is a stuntman and a martial artist, but NOT a fighter. Jet Li is incredibly fast, but he was a FORMS champion, NOT a fighter. Bruce Lee was AMAZINGLY quick, very tough, and was challenged to real fights everywhere he went. Bruce Lee would leave them both quivering and bloodied on the ground. It's not a simple opinion, but the way it would happen. HE was a fighter, and they ARE NOT!
2006-11-10 09:35:29 · answer #5 · answered by Brian D 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bruce Lee
2006-11-09 14:58:31 · answer #6 · answered by ptaewk 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Jackie Chan, Jackie Chan & Jackie Chan though I suppose Jet Li will do good too ; )
2006-11-11 14:35:36 · answer #7 · answered by Sk8erGurl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's definately not Bruce Lee... because his technique seems too slow, but powerful.
It's not Jackie Chan, although he's the fastest, but he lacks the power and the drive to win (he'd rather concede than fight).
So it's got to be Jet Li. He's fast, quick AND powerful.
But regardless, Steven Seagal would whoop all of them.
2006-11-10 14:57:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bruce would kick Jet's rear while Jackie turns flips and watches to see if anyone was laughing at his stupid antics. Then Bruce would use Jet's body as a weapon to crush Jackie. After all of that Bruce would be in such an @$$kicking mood he would beat himself up just for the challenge.
2006-11-09 15:03:17 · answer #9 · answered by DrKenFeelgood 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
okay.. lets look at this strictly from a martial arts standpoint..
you have:
jet li - bejing wushu competitor and champion by age 12.. i know what you're thinking, he's a wushu artist, yeah, but wushu in bejing is a world different from wushu in america.. since then he's adapted other fighting styles into his arsenal of martial arts..
bruce lee- an iconic person who in essence is the fore-father of modern day mixed martial arts.. knowing that you must adapt to your opponent, flow with his movements.. incorporating boxing, and juijitsu into his jeet kun do style...
jackie chan- a great acrobat, learning martial arts for the sole purpose of performance, jackie chan studied with the chinese drama academy, learning theater, acrobatics, martial arts, etc. however dramatic and exciting his on-screen movements are, the martial arts he studied unfortunately tend to hold little depth unless the academy student studies elsewhere for a more indepth martial arts experience...
so given these three pillars of action cinema's martial arts background, i'd have to say that bruce lee would come out the victor, although he'd be given a good fight from both opponents..
but that's just my opinion, i may be wrong...
~*winkz*~
2006-11-09 16:25:09 · answer #10 · answered by nm_angel_eyes 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋