English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I would say it would be a toss up between atheists who if had no food wouldnt waste their time praying for some, and pagans who would just ask nature to provide, and buddhists who would with being able to manifest their own world would bring the food to them. I think that they would also end the show by proofing to the world that not one but many who work in conjunction with one another will survive... I wish you well

2006-11-09 05:11:44 · answer #1 · answered by fryedaddy 3 · 1 0

Survivor is a popularity contest, pure and simple. There is no real danger or skill involved. Sometimes you can even hear bleed-over in the soundtrack from The Price is Right being filmed next door.

You want to see Survivor? Drop two teams in the middle of the Congo with nothing more than a knife. Tell them the chopper will pick them up in exactly one month. See who's there when it comes time for pick-up.

For your example, pick three other teams (I don't care what religion they are) and pit them against me, alone. The first night on the island, I sneak into the other camps and slit the throats of my sleeping opponents. I survived, so I win.

2006-11-09 06:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by whtknt 4 · 0 1

Hmmm, Atheist, Pagan/Wiccan, Christian, and Muslim. I think that's a broad range. We can't fit all religions into it, so I' picked the top four main ones.

Atheists because they are one of the top two growing beliefs.

Pagan/Wiccan is the second top growing belief. I've met more people from these two religions then any other.

Christianity is a powerhouse religion, still practiced by many

Muslim is another powerhouse religion. And it'll help with the ratings.

As for who would win? Who ever makes it the end of the game. REligion won't play a factor in that part.

2006-11-09 05:04:11 · answer #3 · answered by sister steph 6 · 1 0

Christian, Muslims, an even mix of Pagans and Wiccans on the third team, and a mix of Agnostics and Atheists on the fourth.

It would definitely come down to the P/W team and the A/A team. I think the P/W team might have a slight advantage because being out in nature all the time wouldn't phase us.

2006-11-09 05:13:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In actual words a candidate for any elected place of work is shouting from the cheap seats. they'd spout as plenty idealistic rhetoric as they want without accountability for it through fact its imprecise. If its no longer approximately race, gender and faith - issues they shouldn't would desire to talk of as rights on those concerns are certain - they'd be talking rubbish approximately foreign places coverage (how can they talk on the project whilst they don't seem to be attentive to the administrative short from the CIA), the financial equipment - lower back do you desire to attempt to describe macro and micro economics, globalisation etc on your known Joe on the line; crime and punishment - the biggest farce interior the U. S. criminal equipment. in case you are able to no longer concentration on subject concerns, deflect with controversy - it is the interest obtainable.

2016-12-10 05:55:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Buddhists....everyone keeps saying, oh Atheists are so logical...I don't think they would automatically know how to build a shelter or hunt for food any better then the Christian...come on now people. Most Atheists don't even know the difference between atheism and agnostic.

2006-11-09 05:30:59 · answer #6 · answered by James P 6 · 0 0

Christanity, Islam, Hindu and Buddism.

Buddism would win but it would be a tough match between Hindu and Isalm. They would win mostly by the ability to focus in such harsh conditions especially when food is scarce. Christianty, however would loose as they put too much a price on material things and are quite gluttonous.

2006-11-09 05:22:41 · answer #7 · answered by A_Geologist 5 · 0 1

Christian
Muslim
Jewish
Athiest (I agree it isn't a religion, but would be interesting to see them interact with the other religious groups)

Not sure who would win and why...pretty interesting question, would be neat to see if they would do this kind of show.

2006-11-09 05:00:43 · answer #8 · answered by aloneinga 5 · 0 0

I would like to pick the location more than the religions. Let them duke it out in the Gaza strip and see who survived THAT!

2006-11-09 06:02:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Can't we just call it the "beliefs" show, or show of "truths"? Reason being is, I know that I would want to be a part of it, but I'm an Atheist.

I would say Atheist, Christian, Muslim, and Jewish.

I can just picture the Christians praying for fire and food while us Atheists are pigging out and dancing around fires naked (that's what they think, right?).

2006-11-09 05:02:22 · answer #10 · answered by Heck if I know! 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers