English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Everyone is angry with immigrants but what about the companies shipping all thier operations to Asia because its cheaper? And what about the American government shipping materials to these new operations? If a corporation came to your small town, ruined the land,air, and water, then took everyone's jobs and shipped them to another country leaving you and your community screwed (like every major electronics manufacturer has done to Mexico), wouldn't you try to move to another country too?

2006-11-09 03:37:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

Actually "billy d" it is factual that Panasonic, Sony, Samsung, among others have moved factories from Mexico to Asia. Check out Oaxaca, Chiapas, Morelia, or Collima.

2006-11-09 04:21:16 · update #1

14 answers

it is cheaper to use foreigners that's why companies do it, I agree they should make prod in America or at least pay the foreigners in other countries the same amount they would pay an American. so sad how some big business Americans USE other people and take advantage of them

2006-11-09 03:41:30 · answer #1 · answered by Star 4 · 2 1

They are both relevent issues. It's equally important when the bottom line is cheap labor. Whether they allow them in illegally or import them legally or the business just leaves to feed off another society for free. It is globally creating the very rich and the very poor. I can definately see why so many are angry at America. Yes...our businesses have helped some poverty stricken nations...but it's also been a major factor in putting mid-businesses out of business where they were doing fine. I am not so sure the benefit has come close to compensating for the damage done.

2006-11-09 03:52:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Democrats are all for eliminating the tax advantages to US company's that take their company's out of the USA.Perhaps that's one good thing about the gains they made in the House and Senate on Tuesday.Mexico has been the winner in any US company that has opened plants there.They gained far more than they lost.The
American people are the losers in this scenario..We not only lost the company's and the jobs but we gained millions of illegal aliens that our taxes have to pay for.Keep American company's in the USA and hire legal Americans for the jobs.This isn't about being anti immigrant,that's a lie,its about being against illegal aliens.
Facts not untruthful hysterics

2006-11-09 03:59:18 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 2 0

This is not an honest question, but rather; total deception. That there may be people who don't like immigrants in this country is not the polarizing national issue, and it does not do anything to discredit the legitimate concern over ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

You can't have eleven million undocumented aliens in any country. Over ten million people in this country that the government has not a clue as to who they are- is a total national security problem. Are they Pedro from Cancun who is just trying to make money to feed himself, or is it Mullah Mohammed Hate America Akbar Jalalabad who wants to blow something up? Nobody knows.

Yes outsourcing is a huge problem that must be dealt with. Neither of the two political parties wish to deal with this. Ultimantely, when a company spends less on overhead it makes more income, the more income they show- the more money goes to the government.

You don't truly understand whats going on with this particular aspect of government and thats demonstrated by your factually incorrect assertion of what happend to many "small towns in Mexico". If a company went to mexico for cheaper labor, how can who suggest that they shipped those jobs out of Mexico. Mexican labor is about as cheap as you can get.

This may happen from time to time, but when companies go to mexico they usually stay, and that good for America. The more mexicans who can be emplyed in their home country- the less have to come here. Its inhumane not to be upset about people not being employed in their home country, but rather having to move to another country just to get a job.

This isn't about people being against immigrants, this is about people not trying to start citizenship in a country by making your first act as an America an illegal act. Its also primarely about national security.

Get some perspective.

2006-11-09 03:53:40 · answer #4 · answered by billy d 5 · 3 2

A stop should be put on both problems. Just imagine what demand there would be for employees if they hired U.S.citizens and played by the rules. Unemployment and low paying jobs would be non-existant.

The Mexican people would not have this problem if they had a different government that would rather just have their citizens live in poverty or have them sneak into the U.S. where they and their families wil continue to live in poverty and resented by U. S. citizens.

Cracking down on illegals in the U.S. and no longer shipping our jobs overseas would open the door for those who really want to contribut to the U.S. and not just themselves

2006-11-09 04:56:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Un-controlled immigration into the united kingdom brought about an inflow from third international countries and further a pair of dire want for housing and centers, which had to be shouldered with the help of the present inhabitants. Our reward device which become in line with want placed the newcomers at an income as that they had larger households and little or no money . The black financial device began to advance as Profiteering,with much less costly labour grew to become the norm. There must be no protest from the exploited labour stress and unions have been left with little or no ability with the privatisation of companies in finished swing. The national wellbeing began to get further sensitisedd through fact the immigrant inhabitants began to get infiltratedd with the help of Extremist islamic leaders who considered the income of furthering their own hobbies........................countless the ANTI-IMMIGRATION foyer surfaced angrily( those human beings weren't Anti-immigrant ) yet now Anti-further Immigration. The greater liberal between the gang might voice their concerns with the help of calling for the starting to be numbers of unlawful immigrants who have been inspired with the help of the governments loss of action to administration the area. NOW we would desire to provide up further IMMIGRATION ideally FROM those countries helping EXTREMISTS. As Gertt Wilders says wisely, provide up immigration rather from all Muslim countries through fact that is from those countries that countless the topics and help of extremists slip in to the united kingdom.. If immigrants are affected you realize who responsible ,as no you're able to discriminate between the coolest and the ROTTEN variety all facets..

2016-11-23 12:38:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's true that it's wrong that we lose labor to other countries , but that's globalization and it will continue no matter what , and people get angry at immigrants but globalization will continue ,there are signs everywhere pointing to that . All around you , there are things that are mostly made by foreign countries and it leaves economies in usually bad positions but it shouldn't be blamed on immigrants , they just try to make a living for their families as Americans do for theirs' .

2006-11-09 04:04:09 · answer #7 · answered by kame 2 · 1 1

Can you say "MULTI-TASK"? It's not illegal or difficult to be focused on more than 'one' issue. I think it is a slap in the face to Americans for so many of our jobs to be outsourced to foreign countries. Many of our people have lost jobs due to outsourcing and then the only jobs available have depressed wages due to foreigners coming here and working for lower wages. Americans must take lower wage jobs which lowers our quality of life and reduces the taxes we pay into an overburdened tax NEED.

NO, I wouldn't leave my country! I haven't! My household income has suffered due to outsourcing and being laid off. I will stay and do what I can to bring our wages back up to where Americans are accustomed to them being. Deporting illegals and stopping the continual loss of jobs due to outsourcing is one way we can overcome our depressed wages. I e-mail my state representatives and I bombard them weekly with my views on these issues and MORE.

2006-11-09 03:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Lelani 2 · 3 0

forget what companies are doing to your town or country. take some pride, start a company, have enough love for your country to change a corrupt system if that is the main hurdle, or love your country enough to work at it. start at the local level. get involved in local politics. work toward improving your town.. pass bond initiatives for public works projects like water treatment, sewage services, etc....


or, just say, no one wants to work to make my country better, so screw it, I'm leaving, to go live off another country i definitely don't love or whose future i could care less about.

2006-11-09 03:44:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

For starters, I am anti-illegal immigration, not anti-immigration. With that said, people have the brain capacity to be concerned about more than one problem at a time. You don't here people say instead of anti-robbery, we should be anti-rape. They are both bad things.

2006-11-09 03:59:47 · answer #10 · answered by Niecy 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers