English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yesterday I posted five questions, "Will you agree with my religious convictions for best answer?" In the details I said I was one of five things:

Born-Again Christian
Satanist
Chaos Mage
Muslim
Atheist

Funny enough, only the atheist version got tagged.

Do any of you think this is just a coincidence?

2006-11-09 01:35:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I should add that it was deleted for "Chatting & Personal Communication." If this is true and it was deleted for that reason, then why have the other four not been deleted?

2006-11-09 01:38:49 · update #1

14 answers

J.P thk for the 10 pts earlier.

Looks like some people finally realise at the last question on atheist that you have change your religion too much for them to handle. They reported you & hence deletion. I won't be surprise if Y/A may get to the earlier ones too.

have fun! & peace, man

2006-11-09 02:01:20 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

Haha. I do not believe you might get all of it right into a best ten record for individuals who record the whole lot. The causes are as numerous as our persona varieties. For a few, it is merciless a laugh or their possess low vainness or outright imply spiritedness or jealousy. The factor is, a character unsatisfied of their possess epidermis, their possess individual existence, is extra willing to desire to clutter with different humans. Perhaps they acquire a few perverse delight from causing a bit of sting on others to check out to justify or counter-stability their possess unsatisfied lives? (I will admit to reporting different customers for 3 causes: a million. If the so-name query is an seen racial or ethnic slur. You do not see this generally in R&S however you notice it plenty in Politics and Elections. two. If you publish a query that undoubtedly is directed closer to one more person and calls them out or instantly insults them (that's in opposition to YA instructional materials besides). This we see every now and then in R&S. three. It the so-referred to as query or reply is seen span (additionally in opposition to YA instructional materials). What I may not do is record a query in R&S (or any segment) considering the query is foolish or simply making a laugh of faith or existence traditionally. I additionally may not record questions which are thinly disguised messages that invite chat amongst regulars. The manner I seem at it's existence is rough, occasions are rough for plenty of and there may be not anything flawed with utilising YA to kind and increase friendships. We all desire a aid base. Whether it used to be YA Question common or no longer, YA has grow to be a kind of a group discussion board in which friendships are shaped and chat among contributors does take take situation, a minimum of not directly.) EDIT: As in your query and further element I believe it used to be candy and could ordinarily have stared it. I absolutely see no causes why any one could need to record it.

2016-09-01 09:44:19 · answer #2 · answered by adamek 4 · 0 0

that is interesting as the questions made no judgements regarding any of the religions.

So many valid questions are being deleted just because they disagree with someones tiny little world view.

Apparantly the Christion who is doing the reporting isn't practicing love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek or the other philosophies of Jesus.

2006-11-09 02:22:56 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 1 0

I had a question booted yesterday for the same thing. Mine was asking about the election results from across the country and I made a comment about insanity and electing incumbents.

Apparently an abuse troll is lurking, ready to pounce on any question he/she doesn't agree with. And apparently a "thumbs down" just doesn't satisfy his need to control our thoughts.

Ah well, life and answers, goes on.

2006-11-09 01:45:24 · answer #4 · answered by Gem 7 · 4 1

If you get your question banned then tell yahoo that you are reporting them for having terms and conditions that breach the First amendment (the right to free speech), then watch how quickly they are put up again

2006-11-09 06:22:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not a coincidence at all. The Christianazis are ever on the march...

2006-11-09 02:01:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yesterday, on the Yahoo "help and suggestion board" (where you post issues for yahoo, @bottom of the page its under 'Tell us what you think') yahoo was explaining that they understand there's an issue with legitimate questions getting pulled and ...as always...they are working on it....We'll see.

2006-11-09 01:44:32 · answer #7 · answered by Hellsdiner 3 · 4 1

Because the christians seek to oppress us and force us into submission by weight of numbers.


But we must be strong and fight back.

I, as a Crusader of the Nihil, have taken it upon myself to fight back against the christian oppressors and under Lex Talionis I shall dish back to them every pain they put upon us....

2006-11-09 01:45:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Really? I would have placed money on the Satanist question being the one reported. Huh, go figure.

2006-11-09 01:44:57 · answer #9 · answered by sister steph 6 · 2 2

Normally, yes, but considering this web site, probably not

2006-11-09 01:36:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers