I don't get pissed, I just don't believe you. Why do you get pissed if someone suggests we were made by a higher being?
2006-11-09 01:08:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by sister steph 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Evolution does not cut it any more, hasn't in years, science has advanced a little sense darwin's time. If the missing link had been found, if the Cambrian explosion hadn't changed the time frames, if we didn't know about DNA we might still know about Amino acids and the complex and vast amount of date needed to form them into life.
We have very complex irreducibly complex machines within our own bodies that can not be explained by evolution. Their are many more arguments, scientific arguments for design (a name I hate) but I am sure you don't really want facts.
Our planet's gravity if shown on a dial like an old fashioned radio knob with a range of 0 through 1 billion would be set at 1, this doesn't seem important until you know that if it were on 0 you could not have life and the planet would not hold together. If it were set to 2 the earth could only be 36 meters in diameter and you could not have life.
Look for the truth , not just what you have been told in science class. Many liberal teachers teach their truth, not reality or current science.
I am not pissed off, I am just not a knuckle dragging ignorant redneck without any knowledge. I believe God created everything and made it all work together. That is the only reasonable explanation from a scientific point of view or a spiritual point of view.
2006-11-09 01:20:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"The evolutionists seem to know everything about the missing link except the fact that it is missing." G. K. Chesterton
"There are gaps in the fossil graveyard, places where there should be intermediate forms, but where there is nothing whatsoever instead. No paleontologist . . . denies that this is so. It is simply a fact. Darwin’s theory and the fossil record are in conflict." David Berlinsky
"Darwin admitted that millions of ‘missing links,’ transitional life forms, would have to be discovered in the fossil record to prove the accuracy of his theory that all species had gradually evolved by chance mutation into new species. Unfortunately for his theory, despite hundreds of millions spent on searching for fossils worldwide for more than a century, the scientists have failed to locate a single missing link out of the millions that must exist if their theory of evolution is to be vindicated." Grant R. Jeffery, The Signature of God
"I have read the Bible through many times, and now make it a practice to read it through once every year. It is a book of all others for lawyers, as well as divines; and I pity the man who cannot find in it a rich supply of thought and of rules for conduct. It fits a man for life —it prepares him for death." Daniel Webster
2006-11-09 02:01:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Derek B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not Christians, but a vocal subset of the Bible-believing Christians. You have to have sympathy for them. They will deceive or even lie to defend a few chapters in a book that cannot explain the diversity of life on Earth. They say it was all in a box smaller than the volume of creatures it contained. I'd get cranky, too, if I had to keep supporting a position that isn't supported by the facts.
2006-11-09 01:44:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you ought to have suggested,"If guy is produced from the dirt of the Earth, then why is there nevertheless airborne dirt and dirt?" I nevertheless think of its a logical question by way of fact in accordance to evolution, the prehistoric creatures have been replaced via extra greater ones. Then why did no longer that take place with the monkeys? Are monkeys nevertheless the extra suitable race?Do they win the race? Forgive my stupidity. i'm no longer greater adequate to understand. you're precise. So, according to risk the respond is that we did no longer come from Monkeys! Wait! So the place did the airborne dirt and dirt come from?!! Oh No!!! according to risk instead of babies, we ought to continuously have had monkeys!
2016-12-14 04:14:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by kull 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm guessin' you're from the other Camp against the Christians.
I was just wondering, Sir, if the name Charles Darwin sounds like a Jewish or Muslim name to you?
Isn't it true that most all the "Evolution Scientists" were, in fact, Christians?
Sounds very pompous and self-aggrandizing to me when someone who is not a Scientist uses their work and misuses them to mock their own "Religion".
2006-11-09 01:13:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Daimyo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not that evolution says we came from apes that is the problem (actually it says we came from a rock, and the rock came when nothing exploded), it is that the theory of evolution is being passed off as science.
Since it is only a theory, it must be accepted by faith, and therefore it is a religion.
2006-11-09 01:48:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by tim 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
nemrod,
None of what you say is actually true, you are spouting the propoganda from the discovery Institute.
I suggest you look up the definitions of Propoganda, Peer reviewed science and theory then have a look at the judgement in the Dover case. I doubt you will though.
2006-11-09 01:23:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Power and control, the need to be right, maybe just maybe there is more to it than that. Maybe there is a combination of the two or Perhaps we are from another place and/or "time" here to have an experience of how to love and accect one another. Perhaps it is all a matter of perspective?
2006-11-09 01:12:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by iamonetruth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are really pissed by us being created by God, but you cant help it so live with the truth.. Why dont u just say 'i'm pissed as hell' and stop looking for 'pissed members society'
2006-11-09 01:10:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by girlfunny 3
·
0⤊
1⤋